Sewall Wright defined the $F_{ST}$ in a metapopulation as being:

$$F_{ST} = \frac{\text{Var}(p)}{\bar p (1-\bar p)}$$

, where $p$ is a vector of frequencies of a given allele and $\bar p$ and $\text{Var}(p)$ are the mean and variance of this vector.

For example, consider a metapopulation made of 4 subpopulations. The allele frequencies in these 4 subpopulations are p=[0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.3]. $\bar p$ is the mean of $p$ ($\bar p = 0.45$) and $\text{Var}(p)$ is the variance of $p$ ($\text{Var}(p )=0.07 \space$).


Can we define $F_{ST}$ for a multiple allele locus? Or should $F_{ST}$ be defined for each allele independently?

  • $\begingroup$ Can you provide a cite for the idea? The form of these things varies with the source. $F_{ST}$ is a symbol. What is it supposed to stand for, in English? $\endgroup$ – daniel May 30 '14 at 15:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @daniel $F_{ST}$ is also called fixation index. It is an index used in population genetics in order to describe the population structure (non-random mating throughout the population) of a metapopulation. Here is the wiki page. I think there is only one definition of $F_{ST}$ but several ways to equivalently understand it. There are a bunch of ways to measure and approximate the $F_{ST}$ but this is the matter of another discussion. $\endgroup$ – Remi.b May 30 '14 at 15:46
  • $\begingroup$ @daniel You may also want to have a look to the table and to the slide that follows this table on this video at 31'44''. It gives an explanation of where the definition I wrote in my post comes from. I am personally not really able to give you a good intuitive explanation of what $F_{ST}$ is. I am only able to give the mathematical definition of it. Here is a related question I recently asked that might help a bit! $\endgroup$ – Remi.b May 30 '14 at 15:53

Short answer: yes, people have formulated ways to estimate $F_{ST}$ for multiallelic loci, e.g. microsatellites. For a review, see here.

Specifically, Nei could define $F_{ST}$ for multiple alleles as

$F_{ST} = \frac{(H_t - H_s)}{H_t}$,

which is to say the proportion of total heterozygosity that is across rather than within populations. This is agnostic to the number of alleles, as it just uses heterozygosity. I believe there are other formulations as well.

There exist alternate statistics such as $G_{ST}$ and $R_{ST}$ (links under each) which are devised specifically for the multiallelic problem, see also the review for further discussion. Basically, microsatellites have high mutation rates such that they deflate the statistic; this will likely be the case for most multiallelic loci.

It's not clear though which statistic works best in practice as far as I can tell.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.