I have seen/read that the Cuttlefish is able to camouflage itself extremely accurately. I have also seen/read that they are completely color-blind, though see with very high contrast. How does the Cuttlefish manage to blend itself so well to its changing surroundings if it is not able to perceive the colors it is changing itself to?
-
2$\begingroup$ Plants have evolved coloured flowers which they cannot see. Insect mimics have evolved patterns of colour which they cannot see. If the phenotype offers an advantage it can be selected for. Presumably cuttlefish can use other sensory cues to determine the nature of their surroundings and this information can be used as an input into the chromatophores and iridophores. $\endgroup$– Alan BoydCommented Jun 28, 2014 at 17:49
-
2$\begingroup$ @AlanBoyd indeed but since the cuttlefish changes as a function of its environment, it must have some sort of sensory apparatus that can "see" the colors. Whether this happens at the cellular or the organismal level is another matter and what I hope this question might answer. $\endgroup$– terdonCommented Jun 29, 2014 at 14:22
-
1$\begingroup$ @terdon I'm suggesting that there is no need to see the colours. If other (strictly non-visual) sensory inputs are an indicator of lying on a sandy surface then these could be used to promote the "correct" choice of colours. $\endgroup$– Alan BoydCommented Jun 29, 2014 at 16:00
1 Answer
The reason why the cuttlefish is colour blind is because
it just has one type of cone cell. Humans have three different types, each sensitive to a different color of light. With only one cone type, you couldn’t differentiate between different colors (reference).
A study was conducted in the lab of Dr Lydia M. Mäthger where two different checkerboards were used to test their colorblindness.
1) Gray – Green. One green shade, matched to the maximum absorption wavelength of cuttlefish, was combined with 16 different shades of gray. As supposed some shades of gray couldn’t be distinguished from the green by the cuttlefish, which didn’t adapt the body pattern. Experiment one was successful.
2) Blue – Yellow. A checkerboard of blue and yellow matching in intensity was used for the second experiment. The skin color of the test species didn’t change either and therefore experiment two was also successful (reference).
These experiments concluded that it was indeed colourblind.
To confirm the effectiveness of the camouflage, HyperSpectral Imaging (HSI) was used to measure the colour match between the cuttlefish and its background. Using this technology it was perceived as to how a predator would view a camouflaged cuttlefish. It was found that
Cuttlefish can produce color-coordinated camouflage on natural substrates despite lacking color vision, and that the color aspect of cuttlefish camouflage is highly effective against fish predators. Much of the contrast information (which allows a predator to "pick out" a cuttlefish from the background environment) resides in the brightness (luminance) rather than in the color (chromatic) aspect of the reflected light. What this means is that cuttlefish camouflage strategies take away a tool from predators in their ability to pick out their prey from the background and instead leave them with only brightness as a method for prey identification (reference 1 and reference 2).
And now we get to the main question as to how they do it. Cuttlefish are apparently able to detect the intensity of light reflected from objects in its surroundings. It is able to perceive even a 15% change in contrast. In an experiment, it was found that
The animals did not respond to the checkerboard pattern when placed on substrates whose color intensities were matched to the Sepia visual system, suggesting that these checkerboards appeared to their eyes as uniform backgrounds (reference).
In another bit of interesting research done on the ability to copy the patterns on checkerboards (reference), three inferences were drawn
The first find was that the range (relative to the size of the cuttlefish ‘white square’) for the animal to exhibit disruptive skin patterning had to be withing a certain narrow range. Secondly, given the appropriate size of checker, cuttlefish regulated their disruptive skin patterns according to the contrast between white and black squares. Third, by manipulating the number of white squares on a board to just 4 among 316 black squares (or 1.25 %) produced disruptive patterning, yet increasing the number of white squares to 20, 40 or 80 did not increase the frequency of appearance of the cuttlefish ‘white square’, but only its clarity of expression.
This study shows that the number of white objects in the background significantly influence cuttlefish skin patterns further putting stress on its ability to view the polarization of light (reference).
Some cuttlefish camouflage examples
-
$\begingroup$ This is a standard answer from @TheLastWord; A very good answer showing an impressive amount of work with many references! Good job +1 $\endgroup$– Remi.bCommented Jun 30, 2014 at 21:45