3
$\begingroup$

An idle question - if a glass if filled from the tap and consumed immediately, it contains some dissolved oxygen from the physical process of moving through the pipes & tap. If left out (unrefridgerated) and then consumed later the bubbles are gone and there is presumably less dissolved gases.

I'm wondering whether this might have the effect of changing the relative levels of oxygen available to microbiota in the gut, and hence have some effect on the human host?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

If you are speaking especially of the stomach, it actually makes no difference because the extremely low pH of the stomach allows very few bacterial organisms to survive. Often, Helicobacter pylori can however be present. Whether dissolved oxygen makes a difference to it is, to my knowledge, unknown. However, pure water does not stay long inside the stomach and passes almost immediately through to the intestines in most cases, so I doubt it would make that big a difference.

Now, it seems you are actually referring to the intestines in your question. Well, in fact the bacteria that inhabit the gut are almost exclusively limited to the colon and to a limited extent to the distal part of the ileum (small intestine). The stomach and almost all the length of the small intestine are sterile. Water absorption takes place in the jejunum (proximal part of the small intestine), which is a sterile region proximal to the locations colonized by bacteria. In conclusion, the oxygen content of tap water will not influence the bacterial flora simply because it does not come into contact with those bacteria.

BTW, the major difference between tap water that you leave sitting and the one that just came out of the tap is the chlorine concentration (decreases with time). Of course this will favor microorganism development, since it is precisely one of the reasons why we put chlorine in the water in the first place...

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This implies that your water is treated with clorine. Which is not the case for most european countries. Yet, bacteria are usually no problem in the drinking water. $\endgroup$ – Chris♦ Aug 19 '14 at 12:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris No chlorine in Europe? I didn't know that (oh the treachery of learning only by American books! ;-). Do we put something else as a replacement? $\endgroup$ – Raoul Aug 19 '14 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Raoul In fact H. pylori prevalence worldwide is estimated to be 50% (and e.g. 30-40% in the UK). Most people have asymptomatic infections. $\endgroup$ – Alan Boyd Aug 19 '14 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris most European countries use chlorination - see lenntech.com/processes/disinfection/regulation-eu/… $\endgroup$ – Alan Boyd Aug 19 '14 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ @AlanBoyd Yes, of course you are right. I've edited my answer to reflect this imprecision. $\endgroup$ – Raoul Aug 19 '14 at 15:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.