Im an engineer by education and i program a lot, so the question sounds weird to people from other disciplines.

Im trying to better understand the human biological clock. Yet i do not really know what it is. I read about clock genes, endogenous cycles, and other observed phenomena that is time sensitive or cyclical in nature. But is there a centralized model of what the circadian rhythm is or how itis exhibited within the human body?

For example an electrical clock can be modelled with feedback loops or electrical flip flops that control the timing. Ive seen the heart modelled as Van Der Pol oscillator.

Does modern science have some notion of how the "master" clock within the human body work? Is there a feedback or an oscillator model of the master clock?

Thank you for any articles or keywords that ican use to research this question!

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Lacking references, this is only a comment instead of an answer. But the central point of any answer will be: biological clocks also use feedback loops (which form oscillators), albeit (sometimes vastly!) more complex ones than mechanical clocks. There are some fascinating studies which have identified specific gene regulatory feedback loops which control the cyclical expression of specific phenotypes. $\endgroup$ – Konrad Rudolph May 18 '12 at 12:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'm looking at this link that was posted around here earlier: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811695 The first image in this link, would that count as a model of the "master" clock? $\endgroup$ – Alex Stone May 22 '12 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ I’m not sure. The image surely shows a feedback control due to the overall self-inhibitory function. But I cannot comment on whether it’s self-sufficient in maintaining a consistent oscillation frequency or whether it needs external input (the existence of the “clock/npas2” gene seems to imply that). $\endgroup$ – Konrad Rudolph May 22 '12 at 13:01

The situation is quite complex, and there are certain things that we do not fully understand, but I will try to give you an explanation.

First of all, at the cellular level, you have the genetic components of the circadian clock, the clock genes and their protein products.

You can divide clock proteins into positive and negative regulators: the positive regulators modulate transcription of clock-controlled genes and are inhibited by the negative regulators in a loop that lasts approximately 24 hours (in Latin: circa = around and dies = day).

For instance the Clock and Bmal1 nuclear proteins, when present in sufficiently large amount, will dimerize and act as transcription factors on a series of genes that contain a region in their promoter element called E-box. Amongst these are the Period (Per) genes.
Per is then synthesised, and exported to the cytoplasm. Here, if in a sufficiently large amount, it can heterodimerize with the Cryptocrome (Cry) proteins: the dimer will then enter the nucleus and inhibit the transcription actions of the Clock/Bmal couple. This will in turn, block the transcription of Per, that will therefore not be able to dimerize with Cry and stop the inhibition of Clock/Bmal and so on. All of this takes approximately 24 hours.

This basic loop (and some more) is nicely schematised in this review by Reppert and Weaver

Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. - Reppert and Weaver, Nature. 2002 Aug 29;418(6901):935-41.

Schematics of circadian clock - from Reppert and Weaver, Nature 2002

I report here the legend of the figure:

The clock mechanism comprises interactive positive (green) and negative (red) feedback loops. CLOCK (C, oval) and BMAL1 (B, oval) form heterodimers and activate transcription of the Per, Cry and Rev-Erbalpha genes through E-box enhancers. As the levels of PER proteins increase (P, blue circle), they complex with CRY proteins (C, diamond) and CKIε/CKIδ (ε/δ, circle), and are phosphorylated (p). In the nucleus, the CRY–PER–CKIε/CKIδ complexes associate with CLOCK–BMAL1 heterodimers to shut down transcription while the heterodimer remains bound to DNA, forming the negative feedback loop. For the positive feedback loop, increasing REV-ERBα levels (R, circle) act through Rev-Erb/ROR response elements in the Bmal1 promoter to repress (-) Bmal1 transcription. CRY-mediated inhibition of CLOCK–BMAL1-mediated transcription de-represses (activates) Bmal1 transcription, because REV-ERBα-mediated repression is inhibited. An activator (A, circle) may positively regulate Bmal1 transcription (?) alone or by interacting with mPER2. There are probably kinases (?) other than CKIε and CKIδ that participate in phosphorylation of clock proteins.

The clock machinery, however, is even more complex than this and different tissues need to integrate different signals (e.g. light, hormonal concentrations and so on).

However, as nice as this may be, our bodies are not constituted by one single cell... if we "zoom out" a little bit and we go to the tissue or the whole body level, we see that circadian rhytms are present in all sorts of tissues and involve all sorts of different physiological processes. A very interesting question is then: how do cells from different organs coordinate each other so that the interrelation of different circadian processes is always the same? For instance, the release of cortisol peaks in the morning, our body temperature has a peak in the late afternoon and a trough in the early hours of the morning, and our heart rate is higher during the daytime.

In 1972, an article by Moore and Eichler was published, showing that lesioning the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus (a region at the base of the brain) resulted in the "breakage" of the circadian rhythm of corticosterone (the stress hormone).

Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. - Moore and Eichler, Brain Res. 1972 Jul 13;42(1):201-6

The fact that lesioning a bit of the brain resulted in loss of circadian rhythm in the adrenal gland was obviously a very big deal: the central circadian clock of the organism had been discovered.

I will not going too much into that but, since 1972 many advances have been made and nowadays we know that, although the role of the SCN is very important, it is not the only clock in the body. Several peripheral clock exist, in organs such as the pituitary gland, the liver or the pancreas. How all these clocks communicate between each other and what is their contribution to the generation of non-circadian rhythms (ultradian and infradian) are questions that still have to be solved.

A few interesting papers on the matter:

A riot of rhythms: neuronal and glial circadian oscillators in the mediobasal hypothalamus. - Guilding et al., Mol Brain. 2009 Aug 27;2:28.

A clockwork web: circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and disease. - Hastings et al., Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Aug;4(8):649-61.

Peripheral circadian oscillators in mammals: time and food. - Schibler et al., J Biol Rhythms. 2003 Jun;18(3):250-60.

  • $\begingroup$ A fantastic answer! This is the second time I'm seeing a diagram of PER and CRY, and still, I cannot understand it. What I read is that DNA is involved. Does the clock involve the DNA, or is it an "external" protein structure that only touches the DNA? $\endgroup$ – Alex Stone Nov 2 '12 at 6:16
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexStone: well, DNA is used to code for mRNA which in turn generates protein. So, for instance, you will have a Cry gene, which will generate a Cry mRNA which will give the CRY protein. The passage DNA->RNA is due to the fact that certain proteins, called transcription factors, bind to the DNA and allow the initiation of transcription (through another protein, called RNA polymerase). Transcription factors, being proteins, have also been derived from the translation of some mRNA, which was derived from the transcription of some DNA. CRY, PER and the likes are, in fact transcription factors. $\endgroup$ – nico Nov 2 '12 at 7:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexStone: so, in essence you have some transcription factors that control the transcription of each other through their corresponding proteins. Because there is a delay for the cellular machinery to transcribe, translate etc. and the concentration of the proteins need to be sufficiently high, this is not immediate, but takes ~24h. Note that circadian clock proteins do not just regulate their own transcription, that would be useless. They can act as transcription factors for many other genes. Hope it is clearer now, you may have a look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crick%27s_central_dogma $\endgroup$ – nico Nov 2 '12 at 7:10

I've stumbled upon a detailed explanation of the Biological clock. This one is broken into multiple steps and helped me better understand what PER and CRY are. I cannot vouch for the scientific accuracy of the diagrams, but they make sense when combined with text.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.