I read that genetic drift is random variation in the relative allele frequencies of a population.

enter image description here

This question however seems to pin genetic drift down to increasing deleterious allele frequencies. Is the answer to this question correct? I don't think that increase of a deleterious allele necessarily indicates that genetic drift is operating; it suggests genetic drift, because one would think that such alleles should decrease in frequency rather than increase, but random chance in a large population can also increase the frequency of deleterious alleles.


Drift is a random element of evolution from one generation to the next, it is equally likely to spread a deleterious mutation as a beneficial one.

The reason the answer is D is because selection should remove a deleterious allele, while drift makes no distinction, and is therefore the only scenario where drift is expected to be a reasonable answer. However, it is possible for drift to contribute to all of those scenarios.

|improve this answer|||||
  • $\begingroup$ Personally I would prefer that the question you show there said probably rather than definitely - if a deleterious allele is linked to a beneficial one it can be spread by selection despite itself being deleterious $\endgroup$ – rg255 Nov 12 '14 at 18:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.