Does each cell contain only a single copy of its genome? Or are there ever 'extra' copies present.
Reason behind question: Wondering whether gene mutations could be corrected by referencing a 'backup copy'.. If such a thing exists..
As a quick answer, yes, most human cells carry 2 copies of the genome and are known as diploid cells. One copy comes from each of your parents, so they aren't identical, but usually pretty close. Sperm and egg cells only carry one copy of the genome and are known as haploid. During fertilization the 2 cells merge their copies and make a diploid zygote. At the chromosomal level, humans have 23 chromosomes, so a diploid cell has 2 copies of each so a total of 46.
As far as repairing damaged DNA, using one chromosome to repair its damaged counterpart is known as Homologous Recombination.
Diploid cells contain two copies of the genome. Additionally, each copy of the genome can have multiple copies of certain genes. Which can provide a level of protective redundancy.
However, there are a number of potential problems with having multiple copies of portions of the genome such as trisomy disorders (e.g. Down Syndrome). Which is why therapy like you describe is still highly experimental.
Addition to other answers.
Usually a human cell is diploid. Sometimes there might be extra copies of a chromosome and this phenomenon is called aneuploidy (Downs Syndrome, Klinefelter's syndrome etc). This always has deleterious effects because of changes in stoichiometries of different gene products (dosage effect).
Some other organisms also tolerate polyploidy (more than two copies of the entire genome) — salamanders and a lizard whose name I can't remember right now.
Would an extra copy help in providing a functional gene when the other copy is mutated?
Yes and it is the case with all recessive mutations. The effect of loss of function is not seen because the other allele is providing a functional copy (sometimes the dosage is reduced and it affects the system in subtle ways).
However, it the mutation is dominant then extra copies won't help much. For example, a mutation that leads to the formation of a toxic or hyperactive protein (gain of function), then extra copies may at best reduce the overall relative concentration of the bad allele but cannot eliminate its ill effects.
To address the "reason behind the question" - no, this doesn't work as you seem to assume it does. It is the whole point of sexual reproduction to have two slightly different copies of the genome. Mutations are not "corrected" within an organism, because they are not considered a bad thing per se. Mutations are "corrected" across generations, in the sense that maladaptive mutations are selected out of the gene pool, because their carriers don't manage to reproduce well.
If there were a mechanism in the cell which would decide that "this copy of the genome is 'correct', this is 'incorrect', I will replace all differing places in the 'incorrect' copy with the information from the 'correct' copy", evolution would never have happened.
An individual has two genome copies, and each of them gets transcribed from. If one of them contains a mutation with negative effects, then it's bad luck for the individual. The purpose of the two genome copies is to increase genetic variability, not to reduce it.
Most of the above answers are incorrect.
The definition of the genome is all of the encoding genetic material. An individual human genome includes two full sets of 23 chromosomes as well as mitochondrial DNA. There is one copy of this genome in most human cells. A few exceptions: