I am aware of the post here 'Optogenetics - How do microbial opsins work?' however it is a bit too technical for me. I am struggling to understand how the neurons can be genetically engineered to produce these light-sensitive molecules in optogenetics, and how genetically engineering the neurones is even a usable method considering it seems you would have to genetically engineer the neurons one by one. So I suppose my question is: in the trials run of optogenetics so far (with mice), how where the neurons made to respond to the light stimulus?

Also, I was wondering whether the principle behind optogenetics- controlling calls with light- could be used for other treatments e.g. to kill cancer cells?

My biology knowledge is limited to A-Level (final year of high school), however I really want to understand this topic thoroughly, so detailed but not too technical answers would be much appreciated! Thank you!

EDIT: I just wanted to add two more quick questions...

  1. Are the light-sensitive molecules (which I now have read are channelrhodopsins) present all along the axolemma, or just the membrane of the soma of the neuron? (I hope I used those terms correctly!)

  2. Wikipedia says that these channelrhodopsins are non-specific (with some exceptions: The L132C mutation (CatCh) increases the permeability for calcium and generates very large currents.[17] Mutating E90 to the positively charged amino acid arginine turns channelrhodopsin from an unspecific cation channel into an anion channel. This chloride-conducting channelrhodopsin (ChloC) inhibits neuronal spiking when illuminated with blue light.[18]). How then can these channels work, if any cation can diffuse any way through the channel?

  • $\begingroup$ I'm not too familiar with optogenetics in neurons, but I've seen part of a talk about it, and I think they had to run fiber optics through the brain to get the light to specific areas. I assume getting light to other sites in the body would also need fiber optics, if it wasn't close to the skin. $\endgroup$ – user137 Mar 6 '15 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ Fiber optics are not needed :) will try writing up an answer later. So to grasp your level of knowledge, do you know the following terms: viral vector, transformation, photoreceptor, neuron, retina, optic nerve. You can just call out which you don't know. $\endgroup$ – AliceD Mar 6 '15 at 23:14
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisStronks Unfortnately I am unfamiliar with several of those terms! Viral vector (although I am guessing it is just the inactive virus that injects the DNA strand into the cell), transformation, photoreceptor (but guessing that these are just light-sensitive cells like rods and cones. I don't really know how these work though...). $\endgroup$ – 21joanna12 Mar 7 '15 at 11:18
  • $\begingroup$ Expecting your answer @ChrisStronks. Please talk a little about it's uses too $\endgroup$ – One Face Mar 7 '15 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisStronks so if you have the right wavelength of light at high enough intensity you can just beam it through the body? Maybe the fiber optics were used to get specific areas of the brain. $\endgroup$ – user137 Mar 7 '15 at 18:54

Short answer

Optogenetics can be used to make cells responsive to light. One striking use of this technology is to restore vision in the blind by making the surviving neurons in the retina light-sensitive. This can be done by transfecting the retina with genetically engineered viruses that induce the expression of bacterial channelrhodopsin proteins in retinal neurons.


I will explain optogenetics by focusing on one of the most striking applications: to make the blind see. In humans light is sensed by photoreceptors in the retina (see further reading #2). Rods infer grey-scale vision (i.e., night vision), while cones provide color vision when there is enough light available. Rods and cones contain light-sensitive proteins: the photopigments. The pigment in rod photoreceptors is called rhodopsin, in cones they are referred to as cone pigments, which are used for color vision. When light hits the rods and cones, the photopigments catch the light and activate a cascade of second messenger reactions, eventually causing hyperpolarization of the membrane. This hyperpolarization in turn activates secondary neurons in the retina, which eventually carry the receptor signal to the brain, where it is processed and used to generate a visual percept.

Light sensing across single-celled and multicellelar animals is mediated by two large families of proteins: the opsins. Opsin genes are divided into two distinct superfamilies: microbial opsins (type I) and animal opsins (type II). The rohodpsin and cone pigments found in humans belong to type II. Among other differences, type I opsins are bound to ion channels, while type II is not. Type II opsins therefore need a battery of intracellular second messenger molecules to operate. In contrast, the type I opsins, being channel proteins, directly cause intracellular changes by changing the membrane potential upon activation due to ion flow. Type I opsins, being channel proteins are referred to as channelrhodopsins.

In retinal degenerative diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) the photoreceptors degenerate and patients eventually loose their vision. The secondary neurons in the retina, however, partly survive. As explained above, these secondary neurons are responsible for processing the photoreceptor signal and sending it to the optic nerve. Hence, although RP patients miss the photoreceptors, the rest of the visual pathway is ready to rock! Hence, somehow these neurons should be activated. There are a battery of approaches to do just this. Retinal implants activate the neurons directly by electrical activation (see further reading #3).

Optogenetics (Fenno et al., 2013) is another approach where the secondary surviving neurons are made photosensitive, thereby bypassing the photoreceptors by turning the secondary neurons into photoreceptors. The neurons are made photosensitive by making them express channelrhodospins. This is done by injecting a viral vector into the eye such that the virus infects the retinal cells. Instead of a viable virus, however, it is tinkered aound with and the only thing the virus does is incorporate the channelrhodopsin into the genome of the neurons, which start to express it.

Channelrhodopsins are cation channels, and therefore, upon light activation, they allow positively charged ions (notably Na+, but also Ca+) into the cell. This depolarizes the neuron and can induce action potential firing (see further reading #1). Action potentials is the neuron way of transmitting signals to the brain. Hence, by activating the secondary neurons through channelrhodopsin transformation, they start sending light-induced neural activity to the brain. The brain will handle this input as if evoked by photoreceptors and hence will interpret it as light-evoked visual stimuli.

With regard to cancer: It has been shown that expression of channelrhodopsin and illumination of whole-mice resulted in diminished subcutaneous cancer cell counts (yang et al., 2013).

With regard to your first added question: dependent on the exact peptide regulatory sequences added to the protein, or by using viral vectors specifically targeting axons, expression of channelrhodopsins can occur wherever one likes.

Your second added question: Cation channels activate neurons, anion channels inhibit them. This means you can play around with different variants to control neurons at will.

Fenno et al. Annu Rev Neurosci 2011;34:389–412
Yang et al. Cell death and disease 2013;4:e893

Further reading
1. Action potentials and neurons: how-do-the-brain-and-nerves-create-electrical-pulses
2. Photoreceptors: parallels-between-pixelized-image-and-the-human-retina
3. Retina and retinal implants: does-the-retina-encode-visual-information-like-a-bitmap-or-an-svg

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Too good! Real nice answer. $\endgroup$ – One Face Mar 9 '15 at 11:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @OneFace - Thanks! Your appreciation is welcomed - as you indicated elsewhere - the answers that take most of your time get the least upvotes, at least so it seems lol $\endgroup$ – AliceD Mar 9 '15 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer. But you would still need fibre optics to activate the specific neurons. In the comments you said it is not necessary. Can you clarify that point? $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Mar 9 '15 at 13:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @WYSIWYG If you use this technology for retinal repair, then light that enters the eye will activate the transgenic cells that express channelrhodopsin $\endgroup$ – One Face Mar 9 '15 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ @OneFace only in the retina. Optogenetics is usually (till now) used to study neurons in the brain; to stimulate those neuron optical fibres are required. However optogenetics can be used in other cells too by using opsin-GPCRs. Mitochondia expressing rhodopsin has been shown to produce ATP in the presence of light. See this post. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Mar 9 '15 at 16:12

Addition to the previous answer.

How to express channelrhodopsins in neurons?

Other than the method involving direct viral injection, as described in the previous answer, these proteins can be expressed in specific cells by making transgenics (by using promoters that will express the downstream gene in only specific cells).

How does it work?

When a neuron is made light sensitive by ectopic expression of channel-rhodopsins, then they can be made to "fire" (generate action potential) by simple illumination. Fibre optics are used to illuminate specific neurons in the brain. See the image below:

                       enter image description here

Are the light-sensitive molecules (which I now have read are channelrhodopsins) present all along the axolemma…

They would be expressed everywhere but their expression on the axons can be limited because of myelination. It is possible to make certain proteins express in the dendritic region. This requires localization signals called zipcodes (this process is still not understood very well).

How then can these channels work, if any cation can diffuse any way through the channel?

Chr2 can conduct Na+, Ca2+ and K+. Its conductivity for sodium is higher than that for potassium. When the channels open the higher inward flow of sodium would trigger action potential (AP). Moreover Calcium also helps in strengthening the AP. Though the channel can conduct Li+, the ion is not present in the extracellular fluid. Usually the nonspecific channels are not used.

Also, I was wondering whether the principle behind optogenetics- controlling calls with light- could be used for other treatments e.g. to kill cancer cells?

Light (as lasers) is used for killing cancer cells but it does not involve optogenetic techniques. You would need to genetically modify the cancer cell first.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.