Suppose I have a genotype-phenotype map defined by the matrix $\mathbf{Z}$:
The scalars $G,P$ represent the number of genotypes and traits, respectively. The map assigns a set of phenotypic traits (the columns) to a set of genotypes (the rows), where $z_{ij}$ is the quantitative measure of an individual of genotype $i$ with respect to a trait $j$. I want to know how the average value of each of the phenotypic traits changes over time, suggesting I should use quantitative genetics theory and formulate the equation
$\Delta \bar{\boldsymbol{z}} = \mathbf{G}\mathbf{P}^{-1}\mathbf{s}$,
where, $\mathbf{G}$ is the additive genetic variance covariance matrix, $\mathbf{P}$ is the phenotypic variance covariance matrix, and $\mathbf{s}$ is a vector of covariances of each trait with fitness. Assume that I know the frequencies of the different genotypes in the population.
Question 1 Can I formulate the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix from the genotype-phenotype map alone (and pop freq)? Note, I don't know anything about the underlying genetic model - number of loci representing each genotype, dominance structure, epistatic interactions, etc.
Question 2 If I assume the genotypes represent haploid individuals, does this change things? Is the additive genetic variance always equal to the phenotypic variance (assuming no environmental effects) in a haploid model? In other words does $\mathbf{G}\mathbf{P}^{-1} = \mathbf{I}$? What I'm thinking is that epistatic variance might affect things, but it shouldn't affect heritability in a haploid model, which is what $\mathbf{G}\mathbf{P}^{-1}$ is a measure of.