Say a sophiscated scientist in the 19th century noted that applying soy sauce on a dead octopus leads to movement of the legs, as a result of the voltage differences resulting from the salt in the soy sauce. (For example, see this video)

Is there a way for that scientist to prove, using only the methodologies available at that time, that the decapitated octopus doesn't regain the functions that a octopus brain normally has, for even a few seconds, when the soy sauce is applied?

  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you mean by delude by medicine. If you can clarify that, don't hesitate to add it back in, but I don't think it was adding anything to the meaning. Also, this has nothing to do with bioinformatics. $\endgroup$ – jonsca Aug 9 '12 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ Unsure if this is suited for this site. It's really a history question. $\endgroup$ – LanceLafontaine Aug 10 '12 at 0:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LanceLafontaine - Nope, this question is really about how could a scientist use less advanced techlogy to conduct a experiment to develop advanced result $\endgroup$ – user5479 Aug 10 '12 at 0:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Although a proper theory of action potentials was not developed until the beginning of the 20th century, Galvani's experiments date back to the 18th century... $\endgroup$ – nico Aug 10 '12 at 5:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Victor: Galvani's experiments were done on frog legs, I don't think the heart was present. $\endgroup$ – nico Aug 13 '12 at 22:38

Yes. The scientist could cut a small piece of the octopus's tentacle and perform the experiment again. If the same result is observed, no other organs are involved.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.