1
$\begingroup$

I just finished reading J. Craig Venter's book Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life. The book is a little over a year old now, and Venter has an optimistic outlook that bacteriophage therapy will become an effective alternative to gene therapy and viral immunotherapy. He mentioned that the JCVI (J. Craig Venter Institute) is working on such projects. Are other companies also researching, and has progress been made? What are the expected risks? How can rogue, harmful phage mutations be controlled? Can this type of therapy be applied to cancers?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Check out oncolytic viruses $\endgroup$ – mdperry May 28 '15 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ Have you read the wiki page on phage therapy? This technology is only used for treating pathogenic bacterial infections, particularly those that do not respond well (or at all) to conventional antibiotics. It is not related to gene therapy or viral immunotherapy, aside from the fact that phages are viruses, so I'm not sure what "effective alternative" means, as the three are used for entirely different things. Google "gene therapy" and "viral immunotherapy" to learn more. $\endgroup$ – MattDMo May 28 '15 at 23:35
1
$\begingroup$

The Eliava Institute in Tiflis (Georgia (a country)) has been at it since the 1930`s. A US company sells a phageproduct for desinfection of meat.

The risk of Phagetherapy is there, if the phage is ill choosen or contaminated with other phage it could introduce pathogenic genes to the target or other bacteria.

If those risks are eliminated there is very little risk in phage therapy aside from the fact that it may not work at all. Phagetherapy is most useful in regions where bacteria are normally found, in other places the immunesystem will make short work of it.

The faster and cheaper sequencing gets the more effective phagetherapy will become. Since a "bad" bacteria can quickly be isolated and a proper "phage cocktail" can be prepared. If we get to the point that we can sequence the whole microbiom of a person then i bet that Phagetherapy will be a very normal thing.

To your cancer question, i think its rather hard to apply it to cancer therapy except if u are looking to combat the cancer with a Intracellular bacteria...but then again. How u get the phage to it.

A excellent read on this topic is the Book "the bacteriophages".

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In Venter's book he does mention that Russia has been the most active in phage work. With oncocytes if we become skillful enough to genetically engineer phages to their most minor details, can't we just bypass any involvement of a bacterium and just have the phage directly target the cancer cell? Create an oncophage? $\endgroup$ – docscience Jun 5 '15 at 14:18
  • $\begingroup$ I would think that the best way to archive that is to use oncolytic (or a virus that marks the tumor cell for the immunesystem) viruses (mammalian). Phages no matter how cool they are, are specialised towards bacteria. First the phage must get into the human cell. Then it must replicate or inject genome. Then replicate in a orderly fashion and at last get out of the cell. The structure of bacteria and eukaryotic cells is way too different. But oncolytic viruses are a VERY hot topic currently and im sure they will lead the way. Since a designed virus is easy to patent. Even big companies Win:) $\endgroup$ – Inesophet Jun 6 '15 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ Can anyone provide citations or further reading for this? $\endgroup$ – James Dec 7 '17 at 11:15
1
$\begingroup$

You run the risk of the killed cells suddenly releasing huge quantities of cytokines. If this occurs you may cause spike in capillary permeability and basically create massive sepsis. The bacteria will have to be killed SLOWLY to prevent them spilling their contents into the circulatory system. But, I have always believed phages could be engineered to control certain infections like urosepsis. But, any phage therapy may be single use only. I used to inject them into rabbits to prepare antisera used in phage growth experiments, I guess that is one of the reasons phage therapy is out of the mainstream. http://www.nature.com/news/phage-therapy-gets-revitalized-1.15348

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.