6
$\begingroup$

I saw a comment on an answer to another question that touched on an interesting topic:

keeping diversity is useful for parameter exploration or to adapt to future environmental change

My initial thought was that evolution doesn't "know" about the future, so natural selection might decrease genetic diversity even if it meant dooming the species in the long term.

On the other hand, species that have low genetic diversity may be more likely to go extinct eventually. So perhaps over time the surviving taxa are those that have evolved mechanims to "hedge their bets" against future environmental changes.

It's clear that some of the parameters that affect genetic diversity within a species (e.g. mate selection, mutation rate) are heritable, but it's unclear to me how the short-term processes of natural selection relate to the extremely long-term processes of speciation and extinction. This gets into some of the same issues as group selection — how can natural selection, acting on individuals, lead to traits that benefit entire populations or clades? (Perhaps this simply cannot happen.)

Has any work been done on the topic of extinction resistance or the evolution of mechanisms to create and preserve diversity within populations or taxa?

This is a big question so I don't expect a full answer here. I'm just looking for some references as a starting point to learn more about this topic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is a big question, that one of the evolutionary biologists here can probably give a fuller answer to, but you might check out this article by Jablonski $\endgroup$ – Oreotrephes Jun 28 '15 at 16:08
6
$\begingroup$

The topic you describe is very interesting and known as "species selection." Some traits exist that not only affect the reproductive success of individuals, but also affect the diversification rate of the entire species, either through affecting the extinction rate, the speciation rate, or both.

To give you an example, I'll summarize this paper by Goldberg et al 2010. Self-incompatibility (SI) in plants is the ability of a plant to reject its own pollen to prevent inbreeding. This mechanism is expected to increase the genetic diversity of the plant's offspring. Self-incompatibility has been lost many times in the history of flowering plants, yielding self-compatibility (SC), which allows a plant to breed with itself. A plant that can breed with itself has an advantage in that even if the population size is low and it can't 'find' another individual to breed with, it can still breed with itself to produce offspring. However, this trait is expected to result in decreased genetic diversity in the offspring due to inbreeding.

The transition from SI to SC is a common transition that cannot easily be reversed. One might expect, then, that SI would be very uncommon as lineages would lose it to SC. However, it turns out that SC lineages have a lower diversification rate than SI plants in the Solanaceae due to the fact that SC lineages have a higher extinction rate than speciation rate. This difference in diversification allows SI to persist. This is an example of trait-dependent net diversification rate. It is not known exactly why SI lineages have a higher net diversification rate, but it could be related to the higher effective population size which results in "increased polymorphism, lower linkage disequilibrium, more efficient response to purifying selection, more extensive geographic distribution of genetic diversity, and lower rates of extinction".

If you want to read more, I can suggest a few more papers:

The Units of Selection by R.C. Lewontin

Darwainism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory by S.J. Gould

Species Selection: Theory and Data by D. Jablonski

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.