4
$\begingroup$

Given a plant $P$, predict its height $H$ at time $t$ since planting given some environmental variables $E_1, \dots, E_n$. How accurate are the state-of-the-art models for such thing? What data is used to make the prediction?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You should add some more details. What do you mean by state-of-art models. Note that the utility of models depends on the question that is asked. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Jun 28 '15 at 20:42
2
$\begingroup$

I've worked on a couple of these for biofuel production. The answer varies widely according to plant P and how well studied plant P is. In terms of what data is used, it includes but is not limited to: temperature, insolation, length of the day, cloud cover, rain, soil composition, soil type, soil density, other local effects like wind or pests, altitude, humidity, and pH. For corn(food) and miscanthus(experimental biofuel crop) the models are quite good if the year is pretty normal and you're in a well-studied parameter space, mostly because corn and grass grows straight up. For trees, non-crops, non-corn crops, etc the models are almost completely useless. It's a question of testing nearly every possible combination of parameters for each plant P, and how much people care about how tall it gets.

Given how much data goes in, it surprises me that even under ideal conditions(well-studied) some of the parameters the model spits out are impossible/wrong. There's a measure of leaf overlap(just as an example) that's especially poorly defined but a rough proxy might be "number of leaves that shade a specific point, on average" and it's regularly measured at <10 and regularly predicted at well north of 50.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.