7
$\begingroup$

I am reading Charlesworth et al. 1997. They talk about diversity within and between allelic classes.

Nucleotide diversities ($π$) at each neutral site were estimated from the mean of $2 \sum z_t (1-z_t)$, over replicated introductions at the site of single variants, where zt is the frequency of the neutral variant at time t, and summation is over all times until either fixation or loss occurs.

The total genetic diversity at the neutral sites ($π_T$) was also decomposed into that within and between allelic classes at the polymorphic locus. Diversity within allelic classes, which will be written here as $π_A$, was estimated from the mean of $2 \sum \left( x_t(1-x_t)+y_t)(1-y_t) \right)$ where $x_t$ and $y_t$ are the frequencies of the neutral variant within the first and second allelic classes, respectively. Diversity between allelic classes with respect to the polymorphic locus was calculated as the difference between the total diversity values and $π_A$

Note that the parentheses don't match up but this this is what is written in the paper!

Why am I confused about this text?

I am confused about the term allelic class. I first think there is anything fancy in here and I think we can simply replace the term "allelic class" by "allele". but then when I saw the equation for $\pi_A$ I realize that the frequency of the two allelic classes does not necessarily adds to 1 (even though we consider only two allelic classes).

I also got also a little confused about the difference between $\pi$ and $\pi_T$ but I think that they just used two notations for the same think ($\pi = \pi_T$)

In population genetics's jargon, diversity just mean expected heterozygosity. $\pi_T$ makes sense to me. It is just the average heterozygosity $\left(2 z(1-z)\right)$ calculated over all time steps. Maybe a more intuitive to put it would to integrate rather than summing over time rather than time steps.

Question

I can read the equation for $\pi_A$ but I fail to get any intuition behind what it means. For example, I have no idea why it should be called within-allelic class diversity. Where does $2(x(1-x)+y)(1-y)$ come from? My whole issue might boil down to the definition of allelic class.

EDIT

The term allelic class is defined in Innan and Tajima (1997)

Suppose that there are two nucleotides, say A and T, in a particular site. Then, we can divide DNA sequences into two classes: one class includes sequences with A and the other includes sequences with T in this site. We call such a class an allelic class

(Slatkin 1996 might help as well).

I am still not quite sure what the within allelic class variance. Maybe it is: Take the most common sequence in the considered allelic class. For each, sequence, calculate the number of pairwise differences to the most common sequence and square this value. Sum over all sequence and divide by the number of sequences. In math form it would be: $\frac{1}{2N}\sum_i^{2N} (D_i)^2$, where $N$ is the population size and $D_i$ is the number of pairwise difference between the sequence $i$ and the most common sequence in the considered allelic class. Does it sound right to you?

||improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @AMR I deleted my long list of comments... $\endgroup$ – Remi.b Aug 18 '15 at 20:53
2
+50
$\begingroup$

From the way I have read what you have written z(1-z) translated into a sentence would be the frequency of the neutral variant (z) times the frequency of all other possible variants (1 - z) at the particular time t.

Nucleotide diversity is then the average of 2 times the sum of all of the frequencies of neutral variants (z) times the the frequency of all other possible variants (1-z) for all of the time periods until either there is no longer a change in the sequence or the allele is lost (which can happen over evolutionary time, especially if the allelic class is a deleterious variant, or the heterozygous allele provides enough expression to mask).

To me, this sounds like the result will be the probability of the neutral variant existing over time, which should be a number between 0 and 1. If z was 1, that would imply that the neutral variant is always the case, so the frequency of other variants is 0 making 2* 1(1-1) = 0 which makes sense to me as that would mean there is no nucleotide diversity. That sequence is always that sequence and so there is no sequence diversity.

As this looks like it is dealing with frequency distributions I think that total genetic diversity is implying the probability of all of the different allelic classes that make up an allele. So if you have class one which has the frequency of x and a class two with a frequency of y it sounds like the overall diversity would be the probability of the neutral variant of x and the probability of the neutral variant y.

Generally, when you are looking at the probability of multiple events, you would multiply the probability of one event times the probability of the other event. As a result, I am inclined to say that the Nucleotide diversity within classes πA is 2 times the average of the sum of the frequency of x times the frequency of y, or 2∑ x(1-x)(1-y) + y(1-y) or factored 2∑ (x(1-x) + y)(1-y) or in words the Within Class Diversity (πA) is 2 times the average of the frequency of x as the neutral variant times the frequency of all other variants when x is the neutral variant times the frequency of all other variants when y is the neutral variant plus the frequency of y as the neutral variant times the frequency of all other variants when y is the neutral variant.

I think that the reason that this might be done is that, for reasons of selective pressure, x might be favored, so those times that the variant is y, some of those variants (possibly all of them) will be x, so by multiplying the within class diversity of x by the frequency of all of the variants when the class is y implies that there will be less diversity within class than if you just added the frequency probabilities together.

One thing I would do is to do a search to see if there was a correction published to this article, as there was a mistake in the formula. That might help to clarify. Also note, I could be wrong in my assessment as I do not have access to the actual paper you have referenced.

Best of luck in working this out.

||improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ when you are looking at the probability of multiple events, you would multiply the probability of one event times the probability of the other event. This is true if the events are independent, so P(X,Y)=P(X)P(Y). Otherwise, P(X,Y)=P(X|Y)P(Y)=P(Y|X)P(X). $\endgroup$ – ddiez Aug 18 '15 at 2:00
  • $\begingroup$ @ddiez So which formula makes sense? Stats are not my strong suit and I was trying to work through the equation with Remi.b as it seems that there may have been a typo from the original article. Their formula did not have properly paired parentheses and is was difficult to determine whether it should be x(1-x) + y(1-y) or (x(1-x) + y)(1-y)? Thanks. $\endgroup$ – AMR Aug 18 '15 at 2:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My comment is meant just as an extension to your statement, to note that the general formula is the later one (it is true in all situations) whereas the first one is only true under the assumption of independence. But that might be perfectly fine in this context (I haven't read the paper). Lets see the OP opinion on this. $\endgroup$ – ddiez Aug 18 '15 at 4:04
2
$\begingroup$

The term allelic class is defined in Innan and Tajima (1997)

Suppose that there are two nucleotides, say A and T, in a particular site.Then, we can divideDNA sequences into two classes: one class includes sequences with A and the other includes sequences with T in this site. We call such a class an allelic class

Two elements that were misleading (for me at least) in the article

  1. Implicitly, in the paper of interest (Charlesworth et al. 1997), they define allelic classes for a site that is known to be under selection (and that can only be bi-allelic). The concept of allelic class is not for a polymorphic neutral site they look at but always for the same site (the one under selection).

  2. The formula has an extra parenthesis. The real formula should be $2 \sum x_t(1-x_t) + y_t(1-y_t)$.

What is $x$ and $y$?

Consider a polymorphic (bi-allelic) locus (that is not under selection) and calculate the frequency of one allele in the first allelic class (defined for the site under selection) (this is $x$) and calculate the frequency of the same allele in the other allelic class this is $y$. In other words, consider the selected has two alleles $A$ and $B$ and the neutral locus has two alleles $a$ and $b$. $x$ is the frequency of sequences containing $A$ that also contain $a$ and $y$ is the frequency of sequences containing $B$ that also contains $a$.

Meaning of the formula

The formula is just the sum of the expected heterozygosity within each allelic class. $$2x(1-x) + 2y(1-y) = 2 (x(1-x)+y(1-y))$$. Then, we just have to sum over all time step during which the neutral locus is polymorphic and we get $$\pi_A = \sum_{i=1}^T 2 (x_t(1-x_t) + y_t(1-y_t)) = 2 \sum x_t(1-x_t) + y_t(1-y_t)$$, where $x$ and $y$ are now function of the instant (time) considered and $T$ is the total number of time steps.

What values can $\pi_A$ take?

This measure takes values between 0 and $T$ as all $x_t$ and $y_t$ take values between $0$ and $1$ (and therefore $x(1-x)$ and $y(1-y)$ take values between 0 and 0.5). Dividing the whole thing by $T$ will result in a measure that is bound between 0 and 1.

I would have not been able to understand without the help of @AMR. Thank you

||improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.