1
$\begingroup$

The PDCH@ cluster of genes share exons and are therefore isoforms of each other. However, they are considered separate genes, by both HUGO and Ensembl.

A "gene" is defined as "a locus of co-transcribed exons" (Venter 2001), and this locus clearly fits that definition with no ambiguity. So why are these transcripts considered separate genes?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is your question exactly? $\endgroup$ – AliceD♦ Aug 10 '15 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ The question is, why are these transcripts considered separate genes? $\endgroup$ – thc Aug 11 '15 at 0:04
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I slightly modified the question to improve clarity. Feel free to roll back. You may want to add a link to Venter, 2001 too. And transcripts are not genes. $\endgroup$ – AliceD♦ Aug 11 '15 at 0:13
  • $\begingroup$ Related: biology.stackexchange.com/questions/31766/… $\endgroup$ – canadianer Aug 11 '15 at 3:28
1
$\begingroup$

I would say they are considered different genes because each isoform is under the control of its own promoter.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.