I've always wondered how toxins in certain organisms have evolved. Particularly, organisms that produce toxins as a deterrent to predators as opposed to organisms that use it to paralyze their prey.

Where did this toxicity come from? How did it develop to what it is today?

There must've been a drawn out period where evolution 'tested' and 'fine-tuned' the toxin. Presumably until it was somewhat efficacious to the target. What are the current popular theories on this?

  • $\begingroup$ Anything and everything is toxic in the right concentration, so there really is no first toxin. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Feb 20, 2017 at 4:37
  • $\begingroup$ @John There are some compounds that are exceptionally damaging to other organisms in low concentrations but do seemingly no harm to the toxic/poisonous organism. That is what we mean by a toxin here. Furthermore to your point, there is such a diverse range of toxic/poisonous organisms that there were probably many toxic substance evolutionary origin events. $\endgroup$
    – James
    Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 4:50
  • $\begingroup$ if I exposed your brain to your own digestive enzymes or bile either would destroy it. both would be incredibly destructive to any other part of your body. It would be a toxin anywhere else in the body, indeed that is how many venoms start. Other toxinsjust don't matter to the host. Capsaicin is the oil that makes peppers spicy but it only works on mammals (binds a unique to mammals receptor), it does nothing to birds much less plants so of course the plants can make it with no problem. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 5:46
  • $\begingroup$ Basically there is no one way to get a toxin, each toxin is different and evolved from diffrent things in different ways. Toxins have evolved many separate times. That's why your question is confusing, there is no one single toxin precursor and no single way to evolve a toxin. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 6:14

2 Answers 2


General overview.

Each toxin and poison probably have their own evolutionary "arms race". Generally, an organism contains a compound that is a bit harmful to other species. As a predator or prey species becomes tolerant to low doses of this compound through natural selection, the compound efficacy could be increased (again by natural selection) on a molecular level, or at a dosage or concentration level.

Below are a few examples of where this has become the case, and some more general examples of how venom evolved in the first place.


California Newt.

These newts contain tetrodotoxin (you may be familiar with this from the fugu fish). It is preyed on by a species of garter snake. This is a textbook arms race as the garter snake is naturally selected to have beneficial alleles that are tolerant to the toxin.

Dart Frogs.

The golden dart frog Phyllobates terribilis contains enough batrachotoxin to kill 10 people. That is apparently overkilling for any predator it would surely have to face especially given that the only animal alive that is immune to the poison is the frog itself. However, the snake Liophis epinephelus can tolerate massive doses of batrachotoxin (although I've heard it gets pretty poorly after eating a frog, rather understandably). These two species are locked in an arms race that drives the frogs to produce an unbelievably fatal cocktail and the snakes to become ever more tolerant.


Modified sweat glands evolved to damage the prey as much as possible for immobilisation, partial digestion, or defence. There are textbooks about snake venom and toxins. Here is a neat article I found with a cursory search or if you want to sink your teeth into the topic (heh.) check out this article.

Long story short: venom sacks are modified saliva glands from non-venomous snake ancestors. The diagram shows generally just how modified these apparatus have become!

Snake venom gland diagram


Let's not forget the weird and wonderful monotremes. It's hard to pinpoint exactly what drove the platypus to develop venomous barbs on its elbow (last time I looked into it, it was still disputed if they were for defence or hunting).

The barb of a platypus on its rear leg

But what we can learn from this is that venom can independently evolve. Although the venom producing proteins are different, they produce the same venom as some snakes.


Sortof. Just as every adaptation is the product of a small change in something the species already expressed, all toxins start out as something the organism just happens to produce as part of its life. Then there are two evolutionary paths for useful toxins:

  • Poisons - "If you eat me, you will be sorry." These typically begin as metabolites that happen to confer an advantage to an organism's siblings, work as an aid to escape, or are just mildly irritating to predators or parasites.
  • Venoms - "If I bite you, you will be sorry." These typically begin as digestive assistants - mucous or saliva.

Once there is some advantage to expressing a chemical in a certain way it can be considered to be "locked in" - organisms with that trait stand a better chance of surviving to reproduce and will therefore multiply. As the organisms that exhibit that toxin multiply, mutations in their descendants that improve the utility or effectiveness of the toxin allow those organisms to better survive, and so on. So, a saliva gland that once caused mild irritation in a certain species of prey becomes a descendant's vertebrate-paralyzing-venom gland.



You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .