I was attending a talk related to neurogenesis. So one professor was asking a question related to biochemical cues and mechanical cues (related to signaling pathways I believe). Cue as far as I understand is a signal, right? Biochemical cue is understandable for me.

But what does mechanical cue mean?

| improve this question | | | | |

Mechanical pressure, stress, strain or distortion are mechanical cues. In general, cues sensed by mechanoreceptors are mechanical cues!

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is not necessary that mechanical cues are sensed by mechanoreceptors. These cues can also be relayed via the cytoskeleton and the adhesion proteins. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 15 '15 at 4:43
  • $\begingroup$ I doubt adhesion proteins can transduce mechanical signal. They can only recognize specific molecule or protein on opposite cell (or ECM). They are sending chemical signals not mechanical. $\endgroup$ – Dexter Sep 15 '15 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ Adhesion proteins relay the mechanical stress as they are directly connected to the cytoskeleton. They are not really like signalling receptors. See this abstract: "Experimental evidence confirms that cell differentiation or proliferation can be regulated according to the extracellular matrix stiffness...". So adhesion proteins are involved in relaying these signals. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 15 '15 at 4:56
  • $\begingroup$ In given paper, there is no clear indication of any adhesion protein. Given study is mathematical model with correlations. However I found this line in that paper's conclusion, "α5β1-integrin could switch between relaxed and tensioned states in response to traction forces generated by a cell.". This gave me this reference. Which suggest that 'a5b1' is 'most likely' candidate who changes confirmation by mechanical stress. In that case 'a5b1' will be mechanoreceptor by definition :P $\endgroup$ – Dexter Sep 15 '15 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ Well they are not classified as mechanoreceptors, if you are getting what I am trying to say. I am not refuting what you are saying, but you cannot call integrins as mechanoreceptors. This is just like the equilibrium- steady state argument. It is a matter of classification and not an all pervasive superlogic :P $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 15 '15 at 5:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.