I have always imagined that cutting the umbilical cord after birth might be painful. But I have always been confused about who would feel the pain and why. It occurred to me that the mother or the infant could only feel pain if they had nerves connected to the umbilical cord.

  1. Do either mother or infant have nerves running into the umbilical cord that carry nociceptive information?
  2. If not, is there a reason why no pain receptors are present?

2 Answers 2


Short answer
There are no functional nociceptors present in the umbilical cord.

Having had the opportunity to cut the umbilical cord of one of my kids, I can anecdotally confirm neither newborn nor mother gave any sign of pain during the procedure. That is, when cutting the umbilical after the birth of a full-term baby. The only person clenching his teeth was dad :)

In fetuses at gestational age of 18-36 weeks no stress response was noted after puncturing the umbilical (Teixeira et al., 1996), indicative of the absence of pain receptors connected to the baby's brain.

I couldn't find information about pain in the mother, but I cannot imagine that the maternal central pain centers are being connected to the umbilical, which would be pretty extraordinary. This, because long-distance neural connections are rarely, if ever, established in adult humans. Also, I haven't heard any reference to the mother feeling pain because of injury to the umbilical cord. For example, knots in the umbilical cord, or cords wrapped around the fetus' neck due to excessive movements of the fetus are never noticed by the mother, and are only revealed during ultrasounds.

Note, however, that the umbilical cord is innervated by cholinergic neurons that are thought to be involved in the control of blood transfusion to the fetus, but presumably do not carry sensory information to either fetus or mother (Ellison, 1971).

- Ellison, Am J Anat (1971); 132: 53-60
- Teixeira et al., The Lancet (1996), 347: 624


Yes there are

THE placenta and foetal membranes are usually described as being devoid of neural elements1,2. In other descriptions, the possibility of an innervation is not considered3,4. Nevertheless, reports of the presence of nerve elements in these foetal tissues continue to appear in the European literature5–7.


They are especially small

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ a reference from within the last 50 years would be prefered. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Dec 25, 2019 at 4:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .