I know that some animals like birds, bees, and fish can see ultraviolet and infrared light. Whether it to detect flowers that bare nectar, or the urine trails of prey. But what I don't understand is how they see these wave lengths. What is different about their eyes or brain that allows them to see different wavelengths than humans?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to Biology.SE. UV and IR are by definition wavelength that are outside the range of wavelength that humans can see. There is nothing extraordinary about these other wavelength and therefore the question reduced to How do we see colours?. I think this post will answer your question. $\endgroup$
    – Remi.b
    Nov 3 '15 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Remi.b - it doesn't. Hyperspectral vision does warrant a specific answer $\endgroup$
    – AliceD
    Nov 3 '15 at 23:03
  • $\begingroup$ @K Gargiulio's answer is correct in that distinct cone cells allow the perception of these wavelengths. You may also be interested in the descriptions of colour vision in biology.stackexchange.com/questions/39882/…, for further details. $\endgroup$
    – bshane
    Nov 4 '15 at 2:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is not a duplicate because this question specifically asks about UV and IR molecular-sensors. $\endgroup$
    Nov 4 '15 at 5:24
  • $\begingroup$ You might be interested in the eyes of the mantis shrimp. $\endgroup$
    – snd
    Nov 5 '15 at 12:02

Yes, they have different photoreceptors as well as the circuitry to interpret the information from those photoreceptors. Humans have 3 types of cones which are tuned to respond best to red, green, or blue light, but it's not an on or off signal. A red or blue cone may still fire in greenish light, it just fires much less often. The brain takes that input and figures out the color based on the relative firing rates of the red/blue/green cones.

So for an animal that can see in UV or infrared, they need both the photoreceptors that respond to that wavelength of light, and the ability to integrate that response into the bigger picture of how all the photoreceptors are firing.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You have still not answered which photoreceptors are those that allow UV sensing. BTW, IR sensing is not similar to that of other photoreceptors even though the perception is finally similar to vision (like in pit vipers). IR does not cause electronic transition; it rather causes activation of temperature regulated channels. $\endgroup$
    Nov 4 '15 at 6:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In Drosophila photoreceptor R7 and R8 are UV sensitive while R1 - R6 respond to visible light. $\endgroup$
    – Dexter
    Nov 4 '15 at 12:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ photoreceptors don't fire $\endgroup$
    – AliceD
    Nov 5 '15 at 12:08

Short answer
In mammals dedicated UV cones have been found, as well as photoreceptors with secondary peak-sensitivity in the UV range. In fact, human blue cones are sensitive to near-UV.

In humans, the visible spectrum is generally accepted to range from 390 to 700 nm. Figure 1 shows the spectral sensitivities of the various photoreceptors in humans.

Fig. 1. Spectral sensitivity of the four receptor classes. Source: Wikibooks; Sensory Systems

In invertebrates sensitivity to near-UV is quite common. However, some rodents (mice, gerbils and gophers) also feature a peak in sensitivity at 359 - 511 nm. In these rodents and some marsupials sensitive to UV, it is thought to be attributable to a specific dedicated type of cone sensitive to near-UV (Jacobs et al., 1991; Winter et al, 2003). Near-UV is referred to as UV-A, encompassing 315 - 380 nm. Likewise, birds seem to feature a dedicated, fourth cone class to detect UV (Benett & Cuthill, 1994).

In the color-blind flower bat, UV sensitivity has been attributed to a photoreceptor with two peak sensitivities - one in the green range and the other around 365 nm and running down to 310 nm (Winter et al, 2003). Hence, UV sensitivity can be conferred by cones with broad sensitivities ranging into the UV range.

In fact, the aphakic human eye (eyes with the lens removed after cataract surgery are aphakic) has been shown to be sensitive to near-UV. As can be seen in Fig.1, the blue cones are actually pretty sensitive to near-UV. It appears that the lens absorbs much of the UV, rendering UV light useless to humans with healthy eyes (Griswold & Stark, 1992).

Infrared (IR) sensitivity in snakes is mediated by pit organs and not via the eyes. Basically they are heat sensors and likely don't mediate vision as such (Newman et al., 1982). I was not able to find any relevant information on IR vision, or how it should be mediated. In fact, I doubt IR is used for vision at all, i.e., to reconstruct the visual scene. IR vision is used more in the form of general heat detection.

- Benett & Cuthill, Vis Res (1994); 34(11): 1471–8
- Griswold & Stark, Vis Res (1992); 32(9):1739-43
- Jacobs et al., Nature (1991); 353: 655-6
- Newman et al., Sci Am (1982); 246(3): 116-27
- Winter et al, Nature (2003); 425: 612-4


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.