Neurotransmitters must be somehow removed from the synapse once they’ve produced a post-synaptic potential, whether it be through enzymatic breakdown, diffusion, reuptake or another mechanism. However, I rarely see such mechanisms mentioned when discussing hormonal communication. I assume hormones just diffuse away from their receptor and do not continually stimulate the cell. However, there does not seem to be an urgency in breaking it down. Why is there this urgency, then, in the case of neurotransmitters, but not with other first messengers, like hormones?

  • $\begingroup$ I don't quite understand what you're saying. Neurotransmitters and hormones alike are ligands. Dissociation from the receptor is a stochastic process. One ligand can activate a receptor multiple times. Many neurotransmitters are actively removed from the synaptic cleft. What is your question? Why hormones are not removed? Could you limit your question to specific representative example cases? $\endgroup$
    – AliceD
    Commented Nov 21, 2015 at 1:59
  • $\begingroup$ @AliceD Why are neurotransmitters actively removed but hormones aren’t? Is it not just as imperative to remove the hormone from the binding site? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2015 at 2:35
  • $\begingroup$ Does your comment capture the question? $\endgroup$
    – AliceD
    Commented Nov 21, 2015 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ @AliceD I suppose, yes. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 21, 2015 at 12:13
  • $\begingroup$ I edited the question in response to your comments. If this doesn't reflect your intentions feel free to roll back. $\endgroup$
    – AliceD
    Commented Nov 24, 2015 at 10:58

1 Answer 1


Short answer
Hormones act in the order of minutes or hours. Neurotransmitters in the order of milliseconds. Moreover, hormones are blood-born, neurotransmitters are confined to the synaptic cleft or in the extracelular space directy surrounding the neuron. Hence, their mechanisms of inactivation are different.

The distinguishing feature of hormones and neurotransmitters is the fact that the former are generally released into the blood, while the latter are confined to synapses, or the immediate extracelullar neuronal space. Hence, hormones can be readily cleared by the workhorse of blood clearance: the liver. For example, adrenaline is rapidly (half life 5 - 10 minutes) metabolized mainly by the liver, followed by excretion via the kidneys. Diffusion then will draw adrenaline away from the receptors as blood concentration drops. The relatively slow time course is beneficial, as the effects of epinephrine includes metabolic changes, such as the release of glucose to power up the body (Sherwin & Saccà, 1984). This needs time.

In the synapse, there is no blood flow and inactivation has to occur through other means. Further, epinephrine in the above example is a fast acting hormone. Many hormones work on an even slower time frame. For example, a stress-induced cortisol peak can last for as long as an hour (Kirschbaum & Hellhammer, 2000). Neurotransmitter responses may last for a few milliseconds. For example, some pacemaker neurons may fire at rates of 40-50 Hz (Häusser et al., 2004). Hence, neurotransmitters have to be cleared from the synapse at least within 20 ms. To wait for the released neuroransmitter to passively diffuse out of the synapse is simply too time-consuming. Neurotransmitters act at an entirely different time scale.

- Häusser et al., J Neurosci (2004); 24(42): 9215-9
- Kirschbaum & Hellhammer, Encyclopedia of Stress, 3 (2000)
- Sherwin & Saccà, Am J Physiol (1984); 247(2-1): E157-65


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .