4
$\begingroup$

I often heard of athletes in the Olympics who would be accussed of having an advantage because they were intersexed.

Now I know transgenderism and being intersexed are not the same thing, but they can both involve Hormone replacement therapy.

Therefore would a transgender women (ie: a person assigned male at birth, who transitioned to female) have advantage over cisgendered(not transgender or intersexed) women in sporting events due to anatomy or physiology from previously having a male form?

To add detail, I guess it would depend on the state of their transition, so one could use MMA competator Fallon Fox, as an example, or any other transgender women.

My thoughts on the effects of HRT on athleticism for transgender people is that if they were more advantageous, then they should be dominating their respective fields.

As for the biology, I know that bone growth stops at around 20, but how would the HRT affect their muscles, and would muscles even matter without the corresponding frame?

.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ The only advantage that I could see is if they stopped taking HRT female hormones and allow their male hormones to build back up in their system, though I think that people probably made the choice to undergo reassignment for reasons other than gaining competitive advantage in sports. $\endgroup$
    – AMR
    Nov 22, 2015 at 1:50
  • $\begingroup$ @AMR I totally sympathize with trans people and their desire or need to transition, but as to your point, why would a build up of male hormones give them an advantage? $\endgroup$
    – Ro Siv
    Nov 22, 2015 at 3:22
  • $\begingroup$ Why do athletes inject themselves with testosterone? It is needed to increase muscle mass. Male hormones lead to bigger muscles, so if the person was originally XY, then they will begin to produce more testosterone if they come off of the HRT. If they had reassignment surgery, then it will obviously be less than an XY person with testicles, but there will be a higher level of testosterone and other androgens that will cause the body to begin to masculinize again. I am not going to say that there are women who cannot outperform men, but all things being equal, that may lead to an advantage. $\endgroup$
    – AMR
    Nov 22, 2015 at 3:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One thing I think I left out, is that I believe that Male to Female transgender individuals also take androgen blockers to bring them down to similar levels as XX females. Females also produce androgens, but in much lower concentrations or they make fewer androgen receptors in their cells than males. $\endgroup$
    – AMR
    Nov 22, 2015 at 18:43
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question, but pragmatically, the answer is irrelevant because despite the current state of your naturally occurring hormones, you cannot compete in any sport while using HRT, even if for legitimate medical reasons, such as having only one testicle. As for how any sporting commission would choose to classify any transgendered person, whether male or female, probably greatly depends on which sporting commission. $\endgroup$
    – user3970
    Nov 24, 2015 at 9:00

1 Answer 1

2
+50
$\begingroup$

We have two groups of people or better to say scientists and specialists that have their own ideas and theories and approvements.

  1. People that are relay on genetic related ideas that mostly consider rule of Y chromosome on men and how some genes' rules will not be diminished only by hormone therapy or non genetically engineering methods.

Case example:

Chloie Jonsson, 34, who transitioned more than eight years ago, is legally recognized as female in the state of California. Despite the medical community's consensus that transgender women do not have a competitive advantage over cisgender (nontrans) women, Jonsson's application to participate in CrossFit's women's division was rejected with a bizarre letter claiming she and her supporters do not understand "the human genome" and "fundamental biology." In response, Jonsson filed suit against the fitness giant.

The letter from CrossFit general counsel Dale Saran reads:

"We have simply ruled that based upon [Chloie] being born as a male, she will need to compete in the Men's Division. The fundamental, ineluctable fact is that a male competitor who has a sex reassignment procedure still has a genetic makeup that confers a physical and physiological advantage over women. ... Our decision has nothing to do with 'ignorance' or being bigots — it has to do with a very real understanding of the human genome, of fundamental biology, that you are either intentionally ignoring or missed in high school." Later, Saran disputes the statement made by Jonsson's attorney that "by all accounts, both physically and legally, Chloie Jonsson is a female."

"This is simply wrong as a matter of human biology and if you can't see that, there really isn't much to talk about," writes Saran, citing Encyclopedia Britannica. "Chloie was born, genetically — as a matter of fact — with an X and a Y chromosome and all of the anatomy of the human race. Today, notwithstanding any hormone therapy or surgeries, Chloie still has an X and a Y chromosome."

To add some details to group one's idea, if you think of some genes and their rules in men that makes them more accurate and more muscular than women in the field of physical activities, you'll get to the point of how to control or change behaviour of these genes in the body of a man to make him woman, both muscularly and neurologically which is not possible for now because we need some very detailed and powerful calculations to know the exact equilibrium of a man genome as if he was a woman.

To change the complicated mechanism of Y chromosome on Biochemistry and behaviour of other chromosomes we have so much to learn and we need very fast computers to simulate the behaviour of molecules and new formation of mass body.

  1. And we have other ideas by people who insist on level of hormones that has a great effect on mass of bone and muscles in men and women regardless of how their sex and genome is.

Case example:

Eric Vilain, Director of the Center for Gender-Based Biology and Chief Medical Genetics Department of Pediatrics at UCLA, says of any perceived advantage a transgender woman may have, “Research suggests that androgen deprivation and cross-sex hormone treatment in male-to-female transsexuals reduces muscle mass; accordingly, one year of hormone therapy is an appropriate transitional time before a male-to-female student athlete competes on a women’s team."

A great article and detailed explanation by an example that helps to answer your question is here.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .