I read this article https://www.quantamagazine.org/20150206-crispr-dna-editor-bacteria/ and am slightly puzzled as to why the CRISPR/Cas 9 system is seen as being so revolutionary. It seems like the very same thing that micro RNA and short interfering RNA does- cleaves synthesised mRNA strands by attaching to the complementary part of the mmRNA strand, and the restrictive enzymes combine to this RNA and cleave it. I don't see how the CRISPR system is any different or better...

Thank you in advance :)

EDIT: Also, does anyone know whether Cas 9 cuts both DNA strands at the same place, or whether it leaves 'sticky ends'? Thank you.

  • $\begingroup$ answer is that CRISPR targets DNA, while siRNA targets RNA. siRNA is incapable of creating mutations $\endgroup$ Nov 28, 2015 at 0:35
  • $\begingroup$ @aaaaaa Thank you for your reply! I see why CRISPR is important in terms of it targeting DNA rather than RNA now! But I was wondering if you could elaborate on siRNA being incapable f creating mutations... From what I understand, CRISPR only cuts DNA at a specific location, and a different system has to be used to insert a new gene section... $\endgroup$
    – Meep
    Nov 28, 2015 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ @21joanna12 the CRISPR/Cas9 systems being used commercially and in academics have been cobbled together to cut the DNA and deliver a new template sequence into the cut, not only allowing for sections to be removed, but sections added or mutated as well. That is why it's so revolutionary - it's all based on the gRNA. Just change its sequence, and you change your target. (Hopefully) $\endgroup$
    – MattDMo
    Nov 28, 2015 at 16:57

1 Answer 1


The CRISPR Cas 9 system is used to introduce insertion or deletion in a genomic sequence not mRNA.


  • $\begingroup$ this is not an answer. CRISPR/Cas9 system originally is sort of immune response $\endgroup$ Nov 28, 2015 at 0:34
  • $\begingroup$ @aaaaaa The article that 21joanna12 shows mentions the CRISPR/Cas9 system as a research tool to edit genomic DNA, doesn't it? $\endgroup$
    – 243
    Nov 28, 2015 at 7:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Whatever Cas9 is, it was and is never relevant to the cleaving of RNA, only DNA. This is a perfectly valid answer. $\endgroup$
    – March Ho
    Nov 28, 2015 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ this is not high-quality answer $\endgroup$ Nov 30, 2015 at 23:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.