I was just wondering if anybody could help me identify the trees in this image? I am confused as to whether they are aspen or birch, a mix of the two, or whether the brown/reddish trees are some other species I don't know about? Thanks!

enter image description here

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ pretty sure they're aspen trees (upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/…) rather than birchs. The leave colour of birches is normally a darkish green. To make the identification easier, a geographical description would be helpful, and some close-up photos of leaves, branches and the main stem. $\endgroup$
    – Ebbinghaus
    Feb 16, 2016 at 18:51
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ From the growth pattern, I'd say aspens, since they're clonal organisms that grow in groves like that. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Feb 16, 2016 at 18:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the quick answers! It's just picture from a google image search, so I have no idea about the geographic location etc. as this information was not provided. So they are probably aspens then! How about the reddish trees? Do some aspen trees get like that? $\endgroup$
    – Jake
    Feb 16, 2016 at 19:17
  • $\begingroup$ Jes, some aspens can be somewhat orange to red, even in a stand where most are golden yellow. In fact, I've never seen a grove that's all orange, and aspens are common in the mountains here, wherever there is sufficient water. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Feb 17, 2016 at 4:06
  • $\begingroup$ I don't have the vocabulary, but my experience working in forestry alongside professional foresters STRONGLY leans toward aspen. I know that isn't a substantial external justification, but consider it a warning to be sceptical. $\endgroup$
    – Galen
    Oct 15, 2016 at 19:15

2 Answers 2


Turns out this is harder than it seems from just the picture...

The three candidates I think one could most argue for are:

  • Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides)
  • Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera)
  • Grey Birch (Betula populifolia)

Here is a picture of Populus tremuloides from the USDA:

USDA P. tremuloides

Notice the smoothness of the above Aspen bark (identical to that of the picture in the OP's question). Now compare it to the peely nature of typical birch bark (here pictured B. papyrifera or paper birch):


Though not all birch species have peely bark: (my emphasis below)

  • Grey birch (Betula populifolia) typically remains fairly smooth. From Viginia Tech's tree guide:

    Bark: Reddish brown with numerous lighter lenticels on very young stems, later turning gray to white and very chalky; remains smooth and generally does not peel.

  • B. pendula (European white birch) bark is also described as being smooth and only somewhat peely. From Virginia Tech:

    Bark: Reddish brown with light lenticels when very young, later turning white, generally smooth but does peel a bit; the base of the tree develops thick bark which splits into narrow, vertical furrows which are nearly black.

    • However, the branches in the OP's picture are not drooping as is also common for B. pendula (AKA the European weeping birch). So this is not our tree!
  • Also, some sources describe paper birch as simply being smooth (vs. emphasizing the peeliness). See here for an example.

Here are images of European white birch (left) and gray birch (right) :

white birch and grey birch

But Gray birch remains smooth, even at the base of the tree (though see here)...

Pay attention to the bottom of the trees in the OP's picture. The bark at the base of the trees is becoming furrowed:

Zoomed in OP picture:

Zoomed aspen furrowed base

This base furrowing is a characteristic of P. tremuloides:

  • According to the Virginia Tech Tree Guide (my emphasis):

    Bark: At first smooth, creamy yellowish-white to very light green; later developing thick furrows and becoming dark, especially near the base.

  • And according to The Sibley Guide to Trees (my emphasis):

    Bark color from white to greenish, grayish, or bronze. Bark smooth, pale with dark scars that persist for many years; base of trunk becomes coarsely ridged grey on old trunks.

  • And from the NDSU Agriculture webpage (my emphasis):

    Bark Color - Varies from chalky white to olive-gray, and becomes rough furrowed on the lower trunk of mature trees.

  • [Note: I give all 3 sources to demonstrate the inconsistency in description of P. tremuloides bark color].

Here is a close-up of furrowed aspen bark from the USDA website (yes, this is still aspen):

furrowed aspen

However, this furrowing can also occur in paper birch.

  • From V tech (my emphasis):

    Bark: Reddish brown with light lenticels on very young stems; later turning chalky to creamy white, peeling in horizontal papery strips; brown to black and may be furrowed at base; orange inner bark.

  • From Field Guide to Trees of North America (my emphasis):

    Bark white papery; older trees have rough black bark near base.

I will comment that I have never seen paper birch with furrowed bark at the base. Further, I was unable to find visual evidence from any reputable sources by searching on Google.

So what about tree shape and form?

Again, according to The Sibley Guide to Trees:

[P. tremuloides has a] single main trunk with relatively stout , jagged twigs (unlike more slender and graceful twigs of birches).

[B. papyrifera] branches begin lower on trunk than in aspens; more graceful, ascending, and regular with slender straight twigs. Mature tree has oval habit, few strong branches, clumps of fine twigs in the crown.

[B. populifolia has] typically multiple leaning, crooked trunks and narrow crowns. Bark of mature trunks grayish white, nonpeeling.

Citing a different source (Field Guide to Trees of North America) to address different language to differentiate the species:

[P. tremuloides:] Small to medium-sized tree. slender trunk; pyrimidal to round crown of spreading branches with sparse foliage.

[B. papyrifera:] Medium-sized tree. One to several slender, straight trunks; narrow to broad crown; branches upraised in youth, often becoming horizontal or drooping in age

[B. populifolia:] Small tree. sometimes shrubby; One to several trunks; narrow, conical crown.

The smaller trees in the front left of the OP's picture demonstrate a more birch-like architecture and have branches growing along the stem as the description for B. papyrifera describes. These qualities are reduced or eliminated in the larger trees in the OP's picture.

For visual clarification, the typical pyrimidal crown shape of P. tremuloides is shown below (from Oregon State Department of Horticulture). The trees in this image appear more slender (pyrimidal) than the trees in the OP's image, but aspen trees can also have "round" crowns as stated above.


The following photo from Michigan State University Extension's Tree ID Key attempts to demonstrate a difference between paper birch and aspen crown coloration:

birch vs. aspen

The crown branches/twigs visible in the OP's picture seem to be lighter colored, and so this line of evidence points to aspen.

Ok, so what about size? According to Field Guide to Trees of North America the typical sizes of the species under question are fairly similar, but with gray birch being smaller than the other two species:

  • Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides) = 30-70' tall, 1-1.5' diameter
  • Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera) = 50-70' tall, 1-2' diameter
  • Grey Birch (Betula populifolia) = 20-30' tall, 0.5-1' diameter

The relative sizes of the trees in the OP's picture don't seem to preclude any of these species.

Both birches and aspens develop yellow leaves in autumn, so this characteristic additionally is not useful for differentiating the two genera (or 3 species).

Though @fileunderwater is correct in stating that birches have horizontal lenticels that are helpful in identifying birch trees, the OP's image is far too zoomed out to make out any lenticels (even when zooming into the OP's picture). Those black spots are not lenticels; they are scars (generally from lost limbs). Regardless, other species (including some aspen species) also develop lenticels.

Here is a close-up of lenticels. The little slits are birch lenticels (here from B. papyrifera):

birch lenticels

Names on files and webpages are notoriously incorrect so using that as a line of evidence is dangerous. I saw a number of misidentified species in pictures while I was searching myself.

So thus far it seems as though aspen is a pretty good choice, but paper birch could also be potentially correct. The distance of the picture makes this distinction difficult, but I will point to the two lines of evidence that have convinced me that some of the trees are in fact paper birches.

  1. The girth and shape of the larger trees are more consistent with the growth form of birches vs. the usually slender, single-stemmed aspen.

  2. In the OP's picture, you cannot see peeling or lenticels, but this might be due simply to the distance from the trees. However, you can see a brownish/orangish coloration on a number of the trees, which is consistent with numerous descriptions of paper birch trees that have already started peeling revealing brown/orange bark.

Conclusion = Hard to tell, and likely actually a mix of Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera) and Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides). I think you're looking at taller aspen and mostly wider paper birch.


I think they are birch trees (Betula), based on the white bark with black horizontal patterns (Lenticels). The bark patterns at the base of the trees are also very similar to birch. Either way (relating to one of the comments), it's an autumn picture, where both birch and aspen have yellow leafs (aspen leaves can also be red or reddish, especially at the end of branches).

This page also agrees with me (which doesn't necessarily have to mean that much though), which labels the exact same picture as "birch-tree-wallpaper-3.jpg".

I'm not sure about the exact species, but I know that there are North American species where the bark can shift between white, pink or reddish. One possibe suggestion/pure guess is Betula neoalaskana, but as you can see from the wikipedia page this species can also hybridize with Betula pendula and other species. To me, it doesn't look exactly like the Eurasian Betula pendula or Betula pubescens, which I'm most familiar with (those are the two species found in Sweden).

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The name of the .jpg is actually what started my confusion. To me, the bark and the way the leaves are concentrated at the top of the tree makes it look like quaking aspens. However, I don't think I've ever seen the brown/reddish types of aspen before, which makes me think it's birch. Do aspen and birch often grow in the same area? Could it be a mix of the two? $\endgroup$
    – Jake
    Feb 16, 2016 at 19:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Aspen and birch can definitely grow together. I also think that the distribution of leafs is a bit off compared to what I'm used to in Birch, but I'm not familiar with N. American birch species, or hybrids. The sturdier, shorter tree to the right is extremely similar to a birch though. $\endgroup$ Feb 16, 2016 at 19:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Taking another look, I'm really unsure though. The overall look of the stand is very aspen-ish. Also, the thinner branches of birch trees are often relatively dark, while aspen branches are usually ligher and more similar to the trunk, which is more similar to the trees in the picture. Both Populus tremuloides and Populus grandidentata can also be were white with horizontal black stripes. $\endgroup$ Feb 16, 2016 at 19:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I also think they look very much like aspen, and the color of the branches is also a good point! $\endgroup$
    – Jake
    Feb 16, 2016 at 20:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @fileunderwater If you're unsure, you should modify or delete your answer. And I think you're right being unsure, the stand does look very aspen-ish. And btw: Sweden has one more betula: Dvärgbjörk ;-) $\endgroup$
    – RHA
    Oct 15, 2016 at 7:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .