Here is a typical EEG reading:

(source: frontalcortex.com)

If I am connected to an EEG, and am sitting perfectly still, and then begin doing some repetitive motion, say, 10,000 times, will we see discernible patterns emerge in the output?

In other words, would it be possible to categorize a particular pattern in the output and say "Waves with this signature correspond to the subject wiggling his left pinky"?

I would imagine that, over time (and many trials) wave patterns converge to predictable signatures for a given movement.


Specific events, e.g. finger flexions, generate synchronized neuronal responses in the brain that can be measured on the scalp with EEG. However, a voltage response to a single event typically generates a low-amplitude response relative to the background EEG. One way to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio is to repeatedly record the EEG in response to the same event. By time-locking the event with the EEG and averaging the individual event-related EEGs, the random background noise will be reduced (stochastic noise) and the event-related potential (or ERP) can be extracted from the EEG (Woodman, 2010). An example of an ERP to repeated index finger flexions is shown in Fig. 1. Such a wave doesn't need 10,000 repeats. 25 may be sufficient.

If you characterize this ERP and determine specific features of it (duration, amplitude, latency after event etc.) you can generate algorithms that detect these features in the raw EEG, without the need to do repeated measures. In fact, thinking of a motor movement (e.g. grasp that coffee mug) generates very similar EEG activity as the factual act of grasping that mug. By recording the ERPs using events like think of grasping that coffee mug from a person missing a hand, and subsequently designing the necessary algorithms to detect that waveform near-realtime in the person's EEG, one can design brain-computer interfaces to control prosthetic limbs (Guger & Pfurtscheller, 2016).

![motor ERP
Fig. 1. ERP to voluntary index finger flexions. Motor activity was recorded from the motor area. Source: Ball et al. (1999)

- Ball et al. NeuroImage (1999); 10: 682–94
- Guger & Pfurtscheller, AAATE 5th European Conference Advancement of Assistive Technology (2016)
- Woodman, Atten Percept Psychophys (2010); 72(8): 10.3758


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.