2
$\begingroup$

Is DNA so unique that 50% of it is enough to identify a single person?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ any single sperm cell contains half the DNA, but a typical sperm sample has many millions of cells, so in total, the entire DNA is available. $\endgroup$ – user137 Mar 6 '16 at 16:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You make one mistake: The set of chromosomes in sperm and egg cells is haploid, this means that there is only one copy available in each cell instead of two. $\endgroup$ – Chris Mar 6 '16 at 16:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user137 Every sperm cell has the complete set of genes. But only one copy instead of two. So each sperm cell is enough to identify its owner. $\endgroup$ – Chris Mar 6 '16 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris It's way late here, I'm tired. And how often does someone ID a person based on a single cell? $\endgroup$ – user137 Mar 6 '16 at 16:24
  • $\begingroup$ @user137 For forensics this happens. $\endgroup$ – Chris Mar 6 '16 at 17:06
1
$\begingroup$

The comment from @User137 pretty much gets it: the mix of all sperm cells in even a small sample will contain the whole genome on average. So in the hair example in the comments above, there are probably a good number of dead cells hanging onto the hair, enough for analysis. Meiosis will redistribute the DNA sequences inherited from mom and dad randomly, so each sperm is in theory a unique patchwork of that person's genome, but overall the genome will be covered well. Single-cell work, on the other hand, is technically very challenging.

[edit: here is an article describing methods for low-input analysis of forensic samples. Unfortunately paywalled.]

To directly answer the OP on uniqueness: absolutely a single sperm is that unique for each person, in principle. There are lots and lots of genetic variants in each human, and everyone represents a unique mix. It is estimated that 1/1000 places in the genome of each person differ from any other person, on average (for substitutions). there are 3*10^9 places in the genome for this to be the case, which gives you a very large number of differences, ASSUMING that you can actually ascertain all those differences. [edit: for a discussion of these stats see here.]

The technical problem with forensics is that often they only look at a few places in the genome (microsatellites usually), because it is relatively expensive and hard even with recent technology to look at more than that in any detail. This leads to the non-trivial possibility of misidentification with the standard battery of loci. This possibility never goes away entirely, but it becomes very small with more data. I am not a forensic scientist, possibly they have gotten more comprehensive or the methods have changed in recent times.

[edit: here is a document that has what appears to be a readable introduction to DNA forensics, including technical discussions of some drawbacks of marker panels used by for instance the FBI of the USA.]

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

It would be more difficult to identify someone from a single sperm cell, rather than other cells contained in their semen.

However, if we are just comparing the DNA from any diploid cell in the body, you run electrophoresis to compare DNA samples.

For example, if you wanted to establish the paternity of a child. You would collect a sample of the child's DNA, the mother's DNA and the possible fathers' DNA (usually all from cheek or hair cells).

PCR would be carried out to replicate each sample into a large quantity. You would then use the same restriction enzyme in each sample to cut the DNA in specific places along the sample.

Each sample is placed in an individual well at one end of agarose gel, immersed in a buffer solution, and a current passed through (cathode at the well-end, anode at the opposite end).

As DNA is negatively charged due to phosphate groups, it travels towards the anode, through the gel. Shorter fragments of DNA travel faster in the set time the electrophoresis is run for.

Southern blotting is then used to establish a banding pattern of the fragments of DNA - you rule out the bands that the child and the mother share. To establish paternity, you identify bands that the child shares with each possible father. The father whom the child shares the most bands is the most likely father.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Bio. Isn't DNA profiling done with PCR and detection of SNPs? I'm not an expert here, but your answer reads like an undergrad biochemistry assays handbook. The question is not so much how it's done, but if it can be done given the properties of the DNA in gametes and diploid cells. $\endgroup$ – AliceD Mar 7 '16 at 13:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.