Been reading recently about methods to determine how inbred a particular person is by measuring their "runs of homozygosity." Loosly, these are defined as regions of the genome (typically >1Mb) where the person is homozygous for all polymorphisms, suggesting their parents were identical for this region. If a person has 'many' of these regions, it suggests their parents were closely related.
A study in 2015  found some evidence that people with more regions of homozygosity had higher risk of heart disease.
My question firstly relates to the amount of homozygosity you might expect in a 'normal' out-bred person, compared to an in-bred population (e.g. small community), and then to 'extreme' examples of relatedness (parent/child offspring). In my searching I didn't see any cut-offs, if they exist, or whether this is even the right way to be thinking about it. And secondly, just how bad is it to have these runs?
- Christofidou P, et al. Runs of Homozygosity: Association with Coronary Artery Disease and Gene Expression in Monocytes and Macrophages. Am J Hum Genet. 2015; 97:228–237. PMID: 26166477.