1
$\begingroup$

What would happen if nerves didn't have refractory period? And, what part of his nervous system or neurons are not needed?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by March Ho, anongoodnurse, mgkrebbs, rg255, Chris May 28 '16 at 14:14

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Who is "his"? Are you talking about a human neurologic system in general? $\endgroup$ – Vance L Albaugh May 27 '16 at 18:59
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is a scenario case. $\endgroup$ – Milena May 27 '16 at 19:10
  • $\begingroup$ Is this a homework question? If so, you may want to check this out on the help page... biology.stackexchange.com/help/homework $\endgroup$ – Vance L Albaugh May 27 '16 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking about the theoretical implication in terms of the function of neural system? Clearly this is not a biophysically plausible scenario since it will allow infinite number of action potentials in a finite time. $\endgroup$ – Memming May 29 '16 at 13:08
0
$\begingroup$

Refractory period returns the repolarization period to the nerve's resting potential . it's the time taken for recovery of a neuron to generate another impulse being excited by another stimulus . so if nerve doesn't have refractory period they wouldn't be able to return to its resting potential & generate new impulse . moreover the repolarization potential further exceeds its value and cause hyperpolarization , so its badly necessary to restore to resting potential by expelling na+ and taking k+ in . unless it would be impossible to restore the resting potential & be ready to get excited to transmit another impulse via the electrochemical pathway . one more benefit of refractory period is that it causes unidirectional impulse conduction. I didn't get the 2nd part of your question. What are you trying to mean , make it more clear.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer, but since you are a new user, you should give some source/reference for the answer. $\endgroup$ – another 'Homo sapien' May 28 '16 at 5:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.