2
$\begingroup$

I am planning out a dissertation study of Brain-computer Interface (a.k.a. Brain-machine Interface, BCI, BMI, etc) applications.

One of the 3 papers in that dissertation will involve collecting original data, analyzing it, and writing a biofeedback application based upon this data.

I'm in a Computer Science department at a university which does not have a med school, so as far as I know I'll have to purchase the equipment myself out of a very modest research budget.

Thus, my question is "what's the lowest-end (i.e. cheapest) kind of EEG machine which would still be considered modern and sophisticated enough to be publication worthy in journals?".

Of course, I've done a good bit of research on this by reading recently publications on Google Scholar and will continue to do more research, but there's a lot of information overload and I have no prior background with EEG equipment, so any insight would be greatly appreciated.

From what I can tell the main thing driving price is the number of leads or sensors. They seem to range from 1 lead in consumer EEG toys to 100 leads, with a lot of products being advertised that have 16 or 24 leads. There are of course a lot of other features, so feel free to answer using either specific products or in terms of whatever features you've found important.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I have been working with BCI since some time and would recommend you to try these ones. They all have been widely used in MS/PhD research and their results are more or less accepted everywhere:

  • Emotiv
  • NeuroSky (Starts from 99$)
  • g.tec (Most accurate/Expensive one - not recommended for startups)

P.S: Last, but not least, feel free to have a look at BCI Competition datasets. I remember I used them in my semester project. Plus, if you are interested in getting the dataset of invasive BCI, I can provide you the email of respective research as well. Best of luck in your Research!!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's highly useful! Neurosky only has 1 sensor though, right? Is that enough for most purposes? $\endgroup$ – Hack-R May 30 '16 at 14:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Hack-R I would recommend you Emotiv (hence first in list). Emotiv has been used by MS Thesis students regularly here, so its quality would do for you! $\endgroup$ – Failed Scientist May 30 '16 at 14:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.