0
$\begingroup$

I am asking after answering on the ELU.SE sent me on a expedition through the internet. The originating question asked about the meaning of the word proper after the word cell.

At first I was certain about it being a biology term describing some sort of cell. I am not a biologist. After some pushback I researched a bit and found what seems to be the original definition in a book from 1853. Link.

My question now is if you would consider cell proper a biology term or concept that is understood by an expert of cellular structures?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have never heard this term - so it most likely never catched. $\endgroup$ – Chris Aug 3 '16 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ this sounds like an old term that, to my knowledge, is no longer used - not surprising given how much more we know about cellular physiology/structure and functions $\endgroup$ – Vance L Albaugh Aug 3 '16 at 20:56
2
$\begingroup$

This isn't a special biology term, it's just an English usage thing. "The X proper" just means "the X, strictly speaking". As well as the question you quote, see also this question on ELU.SE. I would expect this use to be understood by many biologists who speak English as a first language, but there are certainly clearer ways of saying it.

Regarding this particular example, the author appears to be proposing a way of defining a vacuolated plant cell. It sounds like he is proposing a definition that excludes the cell wall, but he confusingly calls the cell wall the "(cellulose-)membrane" (the 'primordial utricle' is the cytoplasm, I think). However, I am afraid I am not an expert in the history of plant cell biology and can't really comment on whether it is a useful contribution to, or synthesis of, the state of knowledge at the time.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree with the suggestion that this is mostly just a standard usage of "proper." However I would caution that most scientists would probably not understand "the cell proper" to exclude the cell membrane! If I ever wrote that, it would be in a sentence like, "The extracellular matrix, while not part of the cell proper, is an essential aspect of a cell's behavior." $\endgroup$ – AJK Aug 4 '16 at 4:43
  • $\begingroup$ @AJK absolutely. Although I would probably need to read more of the original text to work out exactly what the author is describing - it seems he's talking about something to do with the membranes of vacuolated plant cells, and I haven't studied plant cell biology since first-year undergrad. That said, I can think of very few biological definitions from 1853 that remain helpful today! $\endgroup$ – arboviral Aug 4 '16 at 18:59
  • $\begingroup$ @AJK have read a bit more around it and added what I understand of his proposed definition, with caveats. Please do feel free to elaborate on it. $\endgroup$ – arboviral Aug 4 '16 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.