4
$\begingroup$

While cooking dinner under an extractor on its lowest setting, I noticed that none of the steam (referenced by the amount of fogging on a nearby window, compared to the absence of the fan, was effectively zero) was going anywhere else but through it.

However, placing my hand under the hood, I couldn't feel a difference in pressure. This is most likely due to two things: my hand smoothly transitioned from "normal" atmospheric pressure to the "adjusted" pressure near the hood, and the hood area is quite wide, so that extraction is done over the significant area not covered by my hand and hence less pressure applied.

But it got me thinking, and a literature check revealed nothing helpful so far, as to what is the smallest pressure differential detectable by the skin of the human body?

I would prefer to exclude anything related to hearing, as this is a well-researched area but tells us nothing about the other 99.9% of what is directly exposed to atmospheric pressure changes. Answers that cover particular parts of the body beyond skin and ears (for example, the eyes) are appreciated but only additional.

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

Short answer
The sensitivity to pressure differences highly depends on the study setup used. A paper resembling the conditions in your kitchen experiment concludes that the just noticeable difference ranges from 19 to 35 kPa.

Background
The smallest difference that can be perceived between two stimulus levels is called the just noticeable difference, or JND. The issue with determining pressure difference JNDs is that it may be dependent on many things. To name a few important factors are the place on the body and the type of stimulus used. The fingertips and tongue are among the most sensitive parts of the body, while the back is way less sensitive to mechanical stimulation. The type of stimulus may also dramatically affect the findings, because vibratory stimuli are sensed by other types of mechanoreceptors than static pressure stimuli.

Having said that, I found a paper describing an experiment that resembled your kitchen experiment pretty well . The authors used air puffs applied to the fingertips. They used an apparatus where the nozzle could be adjusted to accommodate different aperture sizes. The authors tested 10 normal, right handed controls and used a standard 2 alternative forced choice (2AFC) task applied as a method of constant stimuli. Personally I would have adopted an adaptive 2AFC task, but both methods are valid. The authors conclude that

Subject-averaged pressure JND values ranged from 19.4 – 24.7 kPa, with no statistical differences observed between aperture sizes.

Reference
- 33rd Bianchi et al., Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Boston, Massachusetts USA, August 30 - September 3, 2011

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.