5
$\begingroup$

I read this article but it didn't explain much. Is the fact people like to cuddle pets with fur connected anyhow with our past when our ancestors had fur as well - and therefore could evolve an instict to enjoy hugging someone furry as an expression of friendship.

$\endgroup$

bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

0
$\begingroup$

An answer I got from Jan Kolář of Charles University:

I'm not sure that people prefer fluffy things just from the fact that they are fluffy. They like things that are soft to touch such like pillows. The popularity of fluffy things might have a simple explanation: There's no danger of getting cut.

So the fact we like to cuddle with dogs and cats has probably nothing to do with our furry past.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It's sensorily similar to "why do people love to eat crunchy things?". Shops contain thousands of the most crispy foods. Crunchy foods and fluffy material like velvet have a common attribute. that they can both generate thousands of complex nerve responses. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1995.tb00782.x

Crispy foods generate nerve responses above 5KHz, and if you feel velvet with your fingers it has a similar effect. It's a kind of vibration, perhaps what they call vibrotactile.

Today they make haptic feedback with vibrotactile actuators, like a console gamepad, which is also designed to be pleasant.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, thanks for your contribution. Have you got anything to base the hyporthesis fluffiness is similar? $\endgroup$ – Probably May 26 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ Also, is there really no deeper explanation when it goes to crispiness? Is it something useless evolution just hasn't got ridden of yet? $\endgroup$ – Probably May 26 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps there is a social element that is common to mammals. It wouls be nice if there was a mechanical or physical explanation for nerve ending, synapse and cerebral effects, but science doesn't seem to have obvioys theories for it, it's even more mysterious than tickling. $\endgroup$ – com.prehensible May 26 at 11:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.