6
$\begingroup$

Can two action potential travel in the opposite directions simultaneous in an axon?

My answer would be affirmative. If the propagation mechanism is linear as described by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cable_theory or even https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegrapher%27s_equations with approximately constant coefficients, the waves are then linearly additive and each signal should propagate unperturbed. The refractory period on each end of the axon can not possibly prevent the other end from being excited at the same time since the signal has not arrived yet.

This question is inspired by the question Can a single axon propagate multiple simultaneous action potentials?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ When the waves collide they should extinguish each other since the membrane each encounters is depolarized (because of the other's propagation). $\endgroup$ – mgkrebbs Sep 17 '16 at 6:57
  • $\begingroup$ @mgkrebbs: How does depolarization lead to extinction of both waves? The equations contradict this claim since the electric (action) potential is additive. $\endgroup$ – Hans Sep 17 '16 at 9:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Hans the waves would extinguish each other because both will lead to depolarization of the membrane. The AP cannot proceed further. AFAIK, the amplitude of the AP would be the same for a certain type of neuron. If they are different then the dynamics may be different. Using a model you may be able to predict the behaviour but I am not sure if anyone has checked this experimentally. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 18 '16 at 8:17
  • $\begingroup$ @WYSIWYG: Your first sentences are stated without reason, just like the statement from mgkrebbs. It seems you are making the same analogy for AP to domino as Superbest does in his answer judging from your concern with the amplitude of the opposing AP's. However, if you switch to the wave analogy then the two should cross each other without interference. It sounds very much like speculation with different analogies leading to completely different conclusions with one no more convincing than the other. But please do derive the proposition if you think otherwise and are certain of its validity. $\endgroup$ – Hans Sep 19 '16 at 3:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Hans No it is not like a usual wave. You have to understand the physiology behind that. AP leads to membrane depolarization. An already depolarized section of the membrane cannot conduct AP. Of course it is not as simple as two waves clashing and annihilating each other. That's why I said that a simulation would be useful (there may be non-intuitive behaviour as these are non-linear systems). I would do the derivations if I had the time. I am a bit occupied and can tell you only what I know right now. $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Sep 19 '16 at 4:38
1
$\begingroup$

Combining the lecture notes on the interchannel and channel electric potential leads to a description of the propagation of the action potential $V$. Specifically, substituting in $I_{\text{ion}}=I_{\text{ext}}$ of equation (6) of cable theory by equation (1) of Hodgkin-Huxley model gives the full propagation equation. A linearization of the Hodgkin-Huxley model leads to a system of linear partial differential equations. I will write out the full formulation and the linear approximation later. That allows complete superposition of action potential. The original non-linear system of partial differential equations under a set of functions/parameterizations at least close to the linear version should permit two opposing wave to cross each other though with interference. So it is not true that all forms of the Hodgkin-Huxley model would prohibit two-wave-crossing.

It would of course be intriguing to investigate the existence of a particular form/parameterization where the model does extinguish two opposing waves with its initial condition being two pulses close to a dirac delta function at each end of the axon.

Here is a paper on colliding waves under the FitzHugh-Nagumo model a special case of the Hodgkin-Huxley model. Just as I expected, the waves do not always annihilate each other, but rather may cross, annihilate or even coalesce or even coalesce then re-emit, all depending on the particular values of the parameters of the model. Here is another paper on the numerical simulation of a full blown Hodgkin-Huxley model reporting crossing of colliding waves. this paper reports under their particular set of parameterization of Hodgkin-Huxley model, two colliding waves annihilate.

The wikipedia page on autowave has some interesting information including references for propagation and collision of nonlinear waves in excitable media.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This answer is theoretical, and it doesn't convince me that the model is a perfect representation of reality. It would be greatly improved if you linked to experimental results showing this phenomenon. $\endgroup$ – March Ho Sep 27 '16 at 10:41
  • $\begingroup$ @MarchHo: The theoretical answer shows the model allows for wave crossing and annihilation, and that the depolarization is NOT sufficient to prevent wave crossing. No model is a perfect representation of reality. This model and numerical simulation precisely refutes the hypothesis "recently polarized membrane" would prevent wave crossing --- as insufficient. $\endgroup$ – Hans Sep 27 '16 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ @MarchHo Although I wouldn't personally accept the answer, it's definitely valuable to know that some models permit the phenomenon. It's an answer in case experimental data does not exist. $\endgroup$ – James Oct 31 '16 at 4:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.