Taking the reciprocal of both sides of the Michaelis-Menten equation yields the Lineweaver-Burk Equation:

$ \dfrac{1}{V} = \dfrac{K_m}{V_{max}}\dfrac{1}{[S]}+ \dfrac{1}{V_{max}} $

Plotting a $ \dfrac{1}{V}$ vs. $\dfrac{1}{[S]}$ graph, I am told that:

y-int $= \dfrac{1}{V_{max}}$ and

x-int $= -\dfrac{1}{K_m}$

How are these relationships derived from the lineweaver-burk plot? I can see how the y-intercept can be equal to $\dfrac{1}{V_{max}}$ if $\dfrac{1}{[S]} = 0$, but I don't see how x-int $= -\dfrac{1}{K_m}$ by setting $\dfrac{1}{V} = 0$? Can someone demonstrate how these relationships were derived?

  • $\begingroup$ Equation of a line: y=mx+c or y=m(x-d) where c is y-intercept and d is x-intercept. The general equation of a line is y-y₁=m(x-x₁) $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Oct 24 '16 at 7:03

Set $ \dfrac{1}{V} = 0$ and solve for $\dfrac{1}{[S]}$:

$ 0 = \dfrac{K_m}{V_{max}}\dfrac{1}{[S]}+ \dfrac{1}{V_{max}} $

$ -\dfrac{1}{V_{max}} = \dfrac{K_m}{V_{max}}\dfrac{1}{[S]}$

$ -1 = {K_m}\dfrac{1}{[S]}$

$ -\dfrac{1}{K_m} = \dfrac{1}{[S]} = $ x-intercept

  • $\begingroup$ (+1) ... and easy to remember if we analyze the situation from a dimensional analysis point of view. The x-intercept of the Lineweaver-Burk plot will have dimensions of 1/[S], so the answer cannot be -Km, -1/Vmax or - Km/Vmax as these are all dimensionally incorrect. Similarly, the y-axis intercept cannot be Vmax or 1/Km or Km/Vmax. It will have dimensions of 1/velocity ( and is 1/Vmax). The same applies to the Eadie-Hofstee plot, the Hanes plot, and all the rest of them (including Michaelis-Menten). $\endgroup$ – user1136 Oct 23 '16 at 13:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.