3
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I asked this question to my Biology teacher and he, in collaboration with a Chemistry teacher, couldn't find the answer. My question is the following: "What does the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ represent in the secondary structure of a protein? I do reference to the $\alpha$ helix and $\beta$ sheets in proteins." I had a similar question with the glucose and we concluded that it was related to the Chemistry, the $\alpha$ or $\beta$, was related with the functional groups bonded to the carbon.

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by MattDMo, kmm, James, Chris Nov 8 '16 at 22:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ use of term alpha and beta for protein-chain-folding is completely unrelated with alpha and beta forms of ring-form monosaccharide. A polypeptide chain can form a spring-shape that is called alpha-helix. A polypeptide can also fold into a flat sheet whose folding pattern is known as beta sheet. $\endgroup$ – Always Confused Nov 4 '16 at 3:05
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Related biology.stackexchange.com/q/45735/3340 $\endgroup$ – WYSIWYG Nov 4 '16 at 7:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To add to the confusion, there is also "alpha sheet", which is rarer : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_sheet and the "beta helix" fold en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_helix $\endgroup$ – gilleain Nov 4 '16 at 11:07
  • $\begingroup$ @gilleain Yes, that what I want, I would like to know why the $\alpha$-helix is not name "$\beta$-helix"? There must be a certain meaning of the $\alpha$ and $\beta$! $\endgroup$ – Matt Nov 4 '16 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Matt - Read WYSIWYG's link. It's really just an arbitrary label. The page for alpha-helix mentions William Astbury as calling the helix "the alpha-form" so presumably it's his fault! $\endgroup$ – gilleain Nov 4 '16 at 12:37
2
$\begingroup$

The answer is very simple. As described in the accepted answer to the related question about alpha-subunits vs alpha-helices the alpha- and beta- are arbitrary names. It could easily have been 1 and 2 or A and B based on ordering of letters or numbers; indeed, there are "type I" and "type II" turns.

The history, from the wikipedia page on alpha-helices says:

In the early 1930s, ... William Astbury initially proposed a kinked-chain structure for the fibers. He later joined other researchers (notably the American chemist Maurice Huggins) in proposing that:

  • The unstretched protein molecules formed a helix (which he called the α-form)
  • The stretching caused the helix to uncoil, forming an extended state (which he called the β-form).

(Emphasis added). In other words, he named the "α-form" first, and considered the "β-form" to be an uncoiled form of the first one. These names later became "α-helix" and "β-sheet". It could easily have been the other way around.

Indeed there are other types of helix; the 310 helix and the π-helix. If either of these had been discovered first, perhaps they would be the alpha-helix. Of them all, the 310 helix has the most 'logical' name as:

the helix has three residues per turn, and ... has 10 atoms in the ring formed by making the hydrogen bond

so if we followed a similar naming scheme, the alpha helix would be a 3.613 helix. Admittedly this is a bit of a cumbersome name.

As well there are the alpha sheet - a sheet made of helical strands - and the beta helix - a helix made of strands. For both of these, the "alpha" and "beta" part of the name has been chosen because of the naming of the original structures they are related to.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.