4
$\begingroup$

I am studying probability, and one of the lectures I came across (Skip to 52:00) states that the sex of siblings is not mutually independent and that there is some correlation.

Can anyone tell me why? And if so, where is the evidence?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

There is at least one paper that claims this:

A test for heritability of the sex ratio in human genealogical data is reported here, with the finding that there is significant heritability of the parental sex ratio by male, but not female offspring.

--Trends in Population Sex Ratios May be Explained by Changes in the Frequencies of Polymorphic Alleles of a Sex Ratio Gene. Corry Gellatly, Evolutionary Biology 36:190-200, 2009 DOI: 10.1007/s11692-008-9046-3.

In other words (simplistically) some families are more prone to have male offspring, which implies that the probability of male offspring is not independent. However, this is a hypothesis, not a proven fact, and I think it's not a very strong hypothesis.

A non-scholarly, but apparently careful, discussion is here:

The odds of having a girl seem decrease after having each boy, but only very slightly. Even after 3 boys, you are only 6.4% more likely to have a 4th boy than a girl.

What are the odds of having another boy or girl?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Has anyone just simplistically looked at how the sex of your first born impacts on your likelihood to have further offspring of the same sex? $\endgroup$
    – Aidenhjj
    Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 16:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I updated the answer to point to a non-peer-reviewed site that looked at that. $\endgroup$
    – iayork
    Commented Nov 10, 2016 at 13:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .