2
$\begingroup$

How would a herbivore's digestive tract differ from a human's? What are parts (organs, tissues, etc.) or enzymes that can't be found in one but is in the other? Also, is it correct to say that a herbivore's digestive tract would be more complex than a human's because herbivore diets tend to contain a lot of complex carbohydrates to digest?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by anongoodnurse, AliceD, kmm, James, MattDMo Nov 25 '16 at 22:14

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ it's a bit of simple quesiton... you would have such a more studied answer if you just look at cow digestion online. For one, vegetarianism requires a longer digestive tract, i.e. 5 stomachs and bigger intestines. and they have different intestinal flora than specialized animals of all other kinds. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruminant#Ruminant_physiology $\endgroup$ – com.prehensible Nov 24 '16 at 15:40
1
$\begingroup$

It depends on the method of digestion the herbivore utilizes and what they eat, grasses, leaves, fruit, or nuts . Ruminants are only one form of herbivore. A wonderful introduction to the various methods can be foundd here. http://vetsci.co.uk/2010/05/14/comparative-digestion/#

For comparison gorilla which are far more herbivorous than human have a much longer small intestines which is one reason they need a much wider trunk. They also of course need larger teeth with thicker enamel and much larger jaw muscles to chew the tough plant fibers. Not so much more complex digestive systems just bigger/longer.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Cutting/pasting an entire answer is not a good way to answer a question on any SE site. Please look at the answers section of the help section. $\endgroup$ – anongoodnurse Nov 24 '16 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ Good point let me fix it. $\endgroup$ – John Nov 24 '16 at 16:38
  • $\begingroup$ Happily removed my DV and replaced with an UV. $\endgroup$ – anongoodnurse Nov 24 '16 at 21:28
1
$\begingroup$

Herbivorous animals certainly tend to have very different digestive tracts to humans, or other carni-/omnivores. In general, mammals cannot produce enzymes that will digest cellulose, so if an animal is to use cellulose as an energy source there must be another way of extracting its energy. Principally, this is fermentation.

Fermentation is the process of bacterial breakdown of a sugar-like compound to other molecules, such as gases, acids or alcohol. Herbivores provide an internal environment that is hospitable to cellulose-fermenting bacteria, and provide them with cellulose (by eating plants!). They then use the breakdown products of fermentation as an energy source - often the relevant compounds are volatile fatty acids.

Different species have solved the problem of having an internal fermentation chamber in different ways. Cattle, as many people are aware, have a complex and expanded foregut, and regurgitate their stomach contents to allow further mechanical digestion. Horses have a vastly expanded hindgut (caecum and large intestine). Rabbits have an expanded hindgut, and also eat (certain types of) their droppings to allow further mechanical digestion.

One other difference that we can observe in herbivores is in the structure of their teeth. A carnivore such as a lion will have sharp, pointed teeth and a wide opening jaw to allow catching and killing prey, and tearing of flesh. Herbivores have broad, flat teeth with rough occlusal surfaces to allow efficient crushing of prehended food. They may also have adaptations for dental longevity - the horse, for example, has hypsodont or long rooted teeth, that erupt through its lifetime to combat the wear of extended chewing of rough material.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to SE Biology. This answer would be improved with some links that confirm your main points. Irrespective, +1 from me. $\endgroup$ – Michael_A Nov 25 '16 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ The information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted. $\endgroup$ – MattDMo Nov 25 '16 at 22:17
0
$\begingroup$

The digestive tracts of ruminants (cud chewers) such as cattle, goats, and sheep are specialized to maximize the benefits of their endosymbiotic microorganisms. In place of the usual mammalian stomach, ruminants have a large, four chambered organ.

The first two chambers, the rumen and the reticulum, are packed with anaerobic microorganisms that break down cellulose by fermentation.

The ruminant periodically regurgitates the contents of the rumen (the cud) into the mouth for rechewing. When the more thoroughly ground-up vegetable fibers are swallowed again, they present more surface area to the microorganisms for their digestive actions.

The microorganisms in the rumen and reticulum metabolize cellulose and other nutrients to simple fatty acids, which become nutrients for their host.

The food leaving the rumen carries with it enormous numbers of cellulose-fermenting microorganisms. This mixture passes through the omasum, where it is concentrated by water absorption.

It then enters the true stomach, the abomasum, which secretes hydrochloric acid and proteases. The microorganisms are killed by the acid, digested by the proteases, and passed on to the small intestine for further digestion and absorption.

The rate of multiplication of microorganisms in the rumen is great enough to offset their loss, so a well-balanced, mutually beneficial relationship is maintained.

It would be more correct to say that Herbivores have special adaptations for digesting cellulose rather than complex as humans also have a complex digesting system.

Hope that helps you.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "The rate of multiplication of microorganisms in the rumen is great enough to offset their loss, so a well-balanced, mutually beneficial relationship is maintained." -- well that's how it should work - in modern farming feeding practices often result in derogation of the rumenal bacterial population. $\endgroup$ – Alex Young Nov 25 '16 at 1:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.