6
$\begingroup$

Rgb scheme

I found this image in a German book about biology. It's called DIN 5033 and represents the RGB color scheme.

What colors are outside the RGB scheme, i.e., in the black areas of the picture?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ DIN 5033 covers wavelengths 380nm to 780nm along its edges. Everything in that space not on the edge varies only in spectral purity. Anything outside those wavelengths would be not covered by this color space (e.g. ultraviolet). Anything in the black area makes no sense (light consisting of nothing but precisely X nm light can't be any more "pure"). Human visual range varies but roughly covers that same spectrum. Outside the range is more towards infrared (higher wavelength) or ultraviolet (lower). $\endgroup$
    – Jason C
    Commented Feb 22, 2017 at 21:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note also that the bottom right edge (magenta) isn't on the visible spectrum, it's a blend of red and blue. Also the black area isn't light outside the 380-780 range, it simply isn't defined, just as (x,y)=(1,1) isn't a possible solution for x^2+y^2=1. If you wanted to modify that colorspace to add infrared/ultraviolet, you would simply increase its perimeter, inserting ultraviolet in the bottom left, infrared on the right, thus shifting magenta more towards the center and the bottom edge becomes a gradient of ir/uv mixes. $\endgroup$
    – Jason C
    Commented Feb 22, 2017 at 21:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you mean "perceived" by something other than human eyes/brains, I would also love to know if cameras/devices that are sensitive to the full spectrum of light have been used to map "invisible" chromatic territory (i.e. by having a machine that can measure frequency) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 20:44

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

This question is both biology and physics I think (I guess it's biophysics! :) so I feel it's worth answering here.

First, we must recognize the difference between wavelength, which is just a physical property of light, and color, which is by definition a human visual perception. The color "red", for example, is a particular visual sensation humans have when encountering light of certain wavelengths. A color cannot be described by a single wavelength number, because the light we see in nature is never monochromatic; it's a complex mix of photons of all sorts of wavelengths.

As John's answer also pointed out, the human eye has three types of cone cells which responds to wavelenghts differently, determined by their absorption spectra (see picture below; R represents the rod cells, which I ignore here). Human color perception can be described as a mix of signals from the L (long wavelength, red), M (medium wavelength, green) and S (short wavelength, blue) cone cells. Mathematically, this is a linear combination $l \cdot f_L + m \cdot f_M + s \cdot f_S$ of the three spectra $f_L$, $f_M$ and $f_S$. The coordinates $(l,m,s)$ generate the LMS color space, which by definition contains all colors humans can perceive.

enter image description here

Now for your question: what colors are outside the RGB scheme?

This depends on precisely what you mean by "the RGB scheme" and "color". The picture you posted is actually not an RGB scheme but a two-parameter color model known as CIE 1931, which is roughly the same as the LMS color space, minus a light intensity parameter. If by "color" you mean the human visual perception, then by definition there are no colors outside the LMS space.

On the other hand, there are many kinds of light that humans cannot perceive correctly: you can imagine from the figure above that there any many cases where two different wavelength mixtures give the same response. For example, a mix of "red" and "green" light may result in the same $(l,m,s)$ values as "yellow" light, even though this is physically different. And of course, some wavelengths our eyes don't register at all, but we usually don't consider such wavelengths as "colors".

Finally, if by "RGB model" you mean the types of light that RGB devices like your computer screen can produce, then the answer is that there are many colors outside RGB. This because RGB devices use light sources for R, G and B with different wavelength profiles than those of the cone cells. Therefore, a typical RGB device generates only some subset of the LSM space. For example, in the figure below, the triangle represents the colors generated by mixing three monochromatic R, G and B light sources in the CIE RGB space, one of many possible RGB spaces.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

the colors we humans with our trichromatic eyes cannot see. enter image description here

.Color for us is produced by a combination and comparison of cell activation. We can see every wavelength between about 4-700nm, we can't differentiate well near the ends or at all for that matter compared to non-mammals. for most of the RGB one wavelength activates more than one cell the comparison of activation creates a color, by activating more than one type of cone cell by different amounts. example activate both red and green but red more than green and you see orange, activate both the same and see yellow.

The deep purples or magentas however are weird and can be activated in two ways. Our red cones actually also pick up light in the 400nm range. so light close to 400nm activates both blue and red but not green (if our red cones did not have this bleed over it would normally be impossible to active red an blue but not green), but you can also trick the eye by using both red and blue light together which produces the same result of activation. that's why you have that purple smear across the bottom of the color chart. enter image description here

But there are also wavelengths below 400 and above 700, Other animals can see part of these wavelengths as colors. There are animals that see colors in what we see as white light. Animals with more than three types of cones or with cones that are activated by different areas of the spectrum see different colors.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well ... The RGB model is certainly designed to create colors that we humans can see, but it's not the same color space, since the R,G and B primary colors of RGB devices have different frequency envelopes than our cone cells. $\endgroup$
    – Roland
    Commented Feb 17, 2017 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ if you look at the OP's graph you can see the same plot our eyes are stuck with, a smooth spectrum from blue to red and purple is when the ends of the spectrum are active without the middle. past that you get into the infrared and ultraviolet. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Feb 17, 2017 at 20:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you look at the OP's chart it is graded by wavelength, Color for us is produced by wavelength or a combination of wavelengths. we can see every wavelength between about 4-700nm, we can't differentiate well near the ends or at all for that matter compared to non-mammals. But there are also wavelengths below 400 and above 700, Other animals can see part of these wavelengths as colors. There are animals that see colors in what we see as white light. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Feb 18, 2017 at 16:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This answer is incorrect. The black area does not contain "colors we cannot see". The black area is undefined because it would represent signals with more than 100% spectral purity (if a signal is already precisely 750nm wavelength with no other components, it can't be more pure than that). IR and UV, if you wanted to add them to that space, would go on the right and bottom left corners respectively, expanding the perimeter of the space and shifting magenta towards the center and making the bottom right edge a gradient of IR/UV blends. $\endgroup$
    – Jason C
    Commented Feb 22, 2017 at 21:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In other words, you are correct in your notice of the wavelength gradations on the edges, but light outside those wavelengths is not what the black area represents. The black area is undefined in the same way that (x,y)=(1,1) is not a solution to x^2+y^2=1. The black area doesn't have anything to do with human perception either, only math. The only part of this colorspace related to human perception is the choice of wavelength range it represents, which was chosen to roughly match the visible spectrum. That choice, even though it makes sense, is essentially arbitrary. $\endgroup$
    – Jason C
    Commented Feb 22, 2017 at 21:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .