4
$\begingroup$

Sporopollenin is the hardest biological substance and can't be degraded by any know enzyme (my school textbook). Then why is pollen used as a dietary supplement if it can't be digested?

Also, pollen depends on nutrients from the plant itself either before or after pollination (before if pollen leaves anther at 3 celled stage and after if it leaves anther at 2 celled stage). Then how would it be rich in nutrients?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But at some sites called as "germ pores" , sporopollenin is absent, so the enzymes may enter it via this, and the digested products may exit via this. $\endgroup$ – JM97 Apr 6 '17 at 14:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you have any citations that suggest that pollen supplements are indeed rich in nutrients or have any beneficial value? All of the evidence I am aware of is that pollen is used as a dietary supplement because people are willing to buy it at a price greater than the cost of producing it. There doesn't have to be any benefit to something sold as a dietary supplement. $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Apr 6 '17 at 18:22
2
$\begingroup$

Bee pollen contains high concentrations of reducing sugars, essential amino acids and unsaturated/saturated fatty acids. It contains minerals such as Zn, Cu, Fe, and high K/Na ratio and significant quantities of several vitamins. Note that the composition of it varies greatly depending on their botanical type and the techniques used by industries. It is basically the collection of pollen grains from flowers made by worker honey bees with nectar and salivary substances.[Source 1](Page 1) [Source 2]

enter image description here [Source 1](Page 4)

The claimed benefits of bee pollen are based on biological and therapeutic activities. The main components are phenolic acid derivatives and polyphenolic compounds. They are known to possess properties such as anti-oxidant, anti-aging, anti-carcinogen, anti-inflammatory, anti-atherosclerosis, cardio-protective and improved endothelial functions. However, it is unknown that treatments with such products are effective or not and how to minimise the health risks.[Source 1](Page 5) [Source 4] [Source 5] [Source 6]

Different studies were conducted in mice on the nutritional effects of bee pollen. It improved food digestion and also improved reproduction rates. Chickens fed with bee pollen had a better development of the small intestine. This suggested that bee pollen helped in early development of the digestive system. Bee pollen is also taken as a supplementation by athletes for improvement of performance. Controlled experiments indicated that no positive benefits were obtained. However, the number of training missed due to respiratory tract infection was lower in the bee pollen treated group.[Source 1](Page 5)

Pollen digestion:

Doubts have been raised, whether the tough shell of pollen can be breached and digested by humans. It was discovered in animal experiments that pollen did not retain its content after leaving thedigestive tract. This gave rise to the hypothesis that the nutritional content of pollen was released by the digestive juices in animals (Schmidt & Schmidt, 1984; Roulston & Cane, 2000). In humans it was once shown that pollen was absorbed in the digestive tract (Jorde & Linskens, 1974) or that it was partly digested, (Franchi et al., 1997) whereas there were differences in the degree of digestion of poppy and hazelnut pollen, with an average degree of digestibility of 15% for carbohydrates and 53% for proteins.

In this case it has been hypothesized that pollen was insufficiently digested and that cracking would improve the digestibility and bioavailability (Rimpler, 2003). Different companies offer cracked bee pollen, claiming that this product is better digested. On the other hand, there are many studies in humans with whole bee pollen showing that a part of the bee pollen content is digested and is bioavailable. However maceration of pollen for several hours in water or other liquids is recommended in order to improve digestibility, this method is used also for other heavy digestible grain products.[Source 1](Page 3 & 4)

Flower pollen:

Non-bee pollen are called flower pollen. Extensive health relevant research has been conducted on pollen prepartions from non-bee pollen. It is marketed under names such as Cernitron, Cernitol, etc. It is known to decrease prostrate hyperteophy in rats, but there was no relevant changes in blood levels of LH, FSH, testosterone or dihydro-testosterone.

In patients with prostatic adenoma the improvement was in nycturie, important decreases in the residue post-urinate and in long term treatment, also decrease in the diameter antero-posterior of prostate. The urinary debit did not suffer any changes. The effect on the other symptoms usual in the hyperthrophie benign of prostate was not of statistical significance (Bruneton, 1999).[Source 1](Page 7)

For industrial benefit:

Improved bioavailability is important in the pharmaceutical industry in that it reduces costs and increases the effectiveness of drugs. Previous studies have shown that this enhancement is possible using exines from pollens and plant spores. In one example the ingestion of ethyl ester derivative of EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) encapsulated in sporopollenin microcapsules from L. clavatum spores improved the bioavailability of EPA in the bloodstream. In these trials, six volunteers ingested 4.6 g of fish oil containing 20% of the EPA ester, both alone, and encapsulated, as a 50% fat content powder, respectively. The bioavailability of the active was defined by area under curve (AUC (area under curve) 0–24 h). The mean AUC 0–24 of EPA from ethyl ester with exine was remarkably 10-fold higher than the corresponding for ethyl ester without exine encapsulation.

In other unpublished studies involving human volunteers, ingesting a lipophilic active, the enhancement of bioavailability has been very similar. The mechanism by which such enhanced bioavailability is achieved is intriguing and some preliminary experiments have been undertaken to explore possible explanations. Recent in vitro studies (unpublished studies) revealed that the exine shells exhibited gut mucosal adhesion properties. In addition, in vivo experiments on mouse microtone sections of intestinal walls of mice fed with exines showed the exines to lie between the gut villi. The unique morphology of exine shell surfaces probably evolved to help pollen particles to become attached to insects and thereby aid the process of pollination. It is possible therefore that this same morphology could help the exine’s adherence to and close association with the gut wall leading to an increase in the period of contact between the encapsulated drug and the biological surface, thereby enhancing its absorption and bioavailability.[Source 3]

Hazardous components of pollen:

Trace amounts of hepatotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids were found in pollen of Echium vulgare, E. plantagineum, Senecio jacobaea, S. ovatus, and Eupatorium cannabinum (Boppre et al., 2008). In Middle and Northern Europe these pollens are not among the main pollen grains gathered by bees, however in Southern Europe the two Echium plants are more diffused and are gathered by bees in larger amounts (Campos et al., 1994; Serra Bonvehi, 1997). [Source 1] (Page 5)

Therefore, it should undergo tests to approve it's purity as allergies can be caused.

References:

1 : Future of bee pollen(Research gate)

2 : Pollen composition and standardisation of analytical methods(Research gate)

3 : Hollow pollen shells to enhance drug delivery(NCBI)

4 : Bee pollen: chemical composition and therapeutic application(NCBI)

5 : Biological activities of commercial bee pollens: antimicrobial, antimutagenic, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory(NCBI)

6 : Biological and therapeutic properties of bee pollen: a review(NCBI)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am skeptical about the broad claims about health effects to say the least. I will have a look on the journal article in question tomorrow, but this is a ten year old review which seems to have not been cited. This is usually not a very good sign. $\endgroup$ – Chris Apr 6 '17 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris The page says that it has 21 citations and 90 references. $\endgroup$ – user237650 Apr 6 '17 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ It is also in a journal that only existed for two years. It's pretty hard for a journal to generate any positive reputation in that little time. Also one of the authors appears to be affiliated with a company in Switzerland that I wasn't able to find any information about, but there is no conflict of interest disclosure in the paper, which is quite troubling. $\endgroup$ – Bryan Krause Apr 6 '17 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ As I said, I will look at it tomorrow when I have journal access. This is not possible from home. But it smells a bit funny to me. $\endgroup$ – Chris Apr 6 '17 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ @BryanKrause Still, such an article can be cited. But it is even not listed in the Pubmed. $\endgroup$ – Chris Apr 6 '17 at 20:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.