1
$\begingroup$

Is it known how long ago the mutation arose in Africa that gives rise to sickle-cell disease and protects from Malaria in heterozygote carriers?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is it safe to assume that the mutation arose after the out-of-Africa migrations, since sickle-cell disease is almost exclusively prevalent in people with more recent African ancestry (i.e., black people)? $\endgroup$ – Abdel May 24 '17 at 11:33
2
$\begingroup$

In a fairly recent review P W Hedrick surveys a number of gene variants associated with resistance to malaria.

He explains that:

The impact of malaria is thought to have increased between 10,000 and 5,000 years ago when there were the beginnings of agriculture and consequently more human settlements. During this period, the numbers of both the human population and the mosquito vector increased, resulting in higher spread of malaria. Recent molecular studies suggest that malaria in humans from Plasmodium falciparum may have originated from gorillas. Using these data, an initial timeline for the origin of P. falciparum as a human pathogen suggests that it may be more recent than previously thought.

As you can see from his Table 1 (reproduced below), the S variant of β-globin is suggested to have arisen 1440 years ago.

Hedrick Table 1

The study of the origin of sickle cell anaemia is complicated by the fact that the allele responsible is found associated with five different β-globin haplotypes (four from Africa, one from Saudi Arabia/India). This has sometimes been interpreted as indicating that the allele arose on several independent occasions. However, the picture is complicated by patterns of human migration, and recent papers suggest that the observed distribution of the S variant is not inconsistent with a single origin, e.g. this paper.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.