For example, we first collect all the RNA contents from a mammalian cell line. Say, for instance, we collect 80 uL of RNA with a concentration of 150 ng/uL. Next, to make cDNA, we take 1,000 ng of the RNA. However, this 1,000 ng is a completely random sampling of the total RNA we had. How is that random sample of RNA representative of the RNA contents originally in our cells?

  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking if mRNA molecules that are present in only few copies may be distorted by random sampling? That's certainly true. $\endgroup$ – Roland May 24 '17 at 6:10

It isn’t really clear exactly what the questioner is asking, but…

...one way of thinking about this is to ask how likely is it that a low-abundance RNA will be absent from the sample taken from the preparation of RNA. This would make the sample non-representative at the qualitative level.

The question states that 12,000 ng of RNA is isolated. Since nothing else is specified I assume this is total RNA. A rough estimate of total RNA per eukaryotic cell is 20 pg.

This means that the preparation came from 6 x 105 cells. (I’m assuming 100% yield, but this won’t really affect the conclusion.)

Now assume that a low-abundance mRNA is present at 10 copies per cell. The total RNA preparation therefore contains 6 x 106 copies of that low-abundance mRNA.

We take a sample of 1,000 ng from the total 12,000 ng. In other words we take 1/12th of the preparation of RNA. If that RNA preparation contains 106 copies of the low abundance mRNA how likely is it that we happen to take a sample which contains no copies of that low abundance mRNA? Here my maths fails me, but intuitively I say that the probability is very very small.

Now, if there are 1,000 different low-abundance mRNAs in the cell the probability of missing each of them is very very small, but the overall probability of missing one of them is 1000 x very very small, so maybe very small.

I'll continue thinking about how to calculate the value of very very small, but if anyone wants to help out - thanks in advance!

  • $\begingroup$ To add to my question, what if you are checking the inclusion of an exon and lets say if we assumed that the alternative exon shows up in 15% of gene X. However, if we take a random 12th, couldn't the 12th be non representative and show something like 60% inclusion when it should actually be much lower? $\endgroup$ – SurfandTurf May 24 '17 at 14:36
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, there are all kinds of ways in which, due to chance, the final cDNA mixture might be a rather skewed reflection of the original mRNA distribution, as Roland said in his comment. $\endgroup$ – Alan Boyd May 24 '17 at 14:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.