5
$\begingroup$

What are the primary functions of the sieve plates that make them so crucial? I've done a bit of reading online and found "Sieve plates are perforated end walls separating the component cells (sieve elements) that make up the phloem sieve tubes in vascular plants. The perforations permit the flow of water and dissolved organic solutes along the tube and are lined with callose." However, wouldn't the flow of water or organic diluted be faster without the extra sieve plates obstructing the flow? Or is there some other functions of the sieve tubes?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

First of all, phloem sieve cells (opposing to xylem vessels) are live cells. In the phloem, a transport occurs not like in water pipes (with free movement of liquids) but through cells transport structures, particularly through plasmodesmata. As live cells, sieve elements need all standard structures, including cell wall, to sustain functionality.

Moreover, the phloem transport is (at least partially) an active process. I.e. to transport something you have to spend some energy. Today the most supported hypothesis of phloem transport is Pressure Flow Hypothesis . According to Wikipedia:

While movement of water and minerals through the xylem is driven by negative pressures (tension) most of the time, movement through the phloem is driven by positive hydrostatic pressure. This process is termed translocation, and is accomplished by a process called phloem loading and unloading. Cells in a sugar source "load" a sieve-tube element by actively transporting solute molecules into it. This causes water to move into the sieve-tube element by osmosis, creating pressure that pushes the sap down the tube. In sugar sinks, cells actively transport solutes out of the sieve-tube elements, producing the exactly opposite effect. The gradient of sugar from source to sink causes pressure flow through the sieve tube toward the sink.

So, a plant needs live cells to support such mechanism.

Here we come to sieve plates. In plants, live cells interacts by means of plasmodesmata. In simple words, they are extensions of endoplasmatic reticulum which connect the cytoplasm of two cells and act as transport channels. And sive plates are simply places of highly hypertrophied plasmodesmata region.

So in conclusion:

  1. Phloem transport is a partially active transport which occurs with an involvement of cells transport structures like plasmodesmata.
  2. The region of hyper-developed plasmodesmata on sieve elements wall appears as sieve plate.
  3. That is why an absence of such structure will not provide any gains in conductivity.

UPD. In response to Jim Young comment. Damage protection is not a major role of sieve plates. Again, sieve plates are areas where plasmodesmata penetrate cell wall. Plasmodesmata act as the main vector of intercellular transport. So, the transport is the main purpose (or a reason) of sieve plates. The damage protection is an additional property and not an aim of these structures. As to tyloses, yes it is a common mechanism of vertical transport prevention in xylem. But xylem vessels consist of dead cells. They are literally pipes. Therefore it is possible to cork up xylem vessels by simply inserting packs of fibre. BTW, that is why cavitation in vessels can cause embolization. In contrast, phloem cells are live cells (with cytoplasm and EPR). They conduct water and sugars not by free flaw but with an involvement of intercellular mechanisms. That is why mechanical embolization is not a case for phloem cells.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My understanding is a bit limited and highly simplistic. As I understand, the purpose of sieve plates is damage control. The sieve plates are crossed by long p-protein molecules that assist in translocation across the plates. When damage occurs, these proteins become detached and clog the pores of the sieve plate, sealing the tube. Without the sieve plates, compartmentalization of damage would need to be accomplished in a different way. Ray cells project tyloses into xylem lumens - presumably some analogous self-sacrifice by companion cells could seal phloem tubes, but it isn't - why not? $\endgroup$ – Jim Young Jul 24 '17 at 2:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.