0
$\begingroup$

In Uncompetitive inhibitors , the Km decrease . With uncompetitive inhibitors , the affinity of the enzyme for the substrate (E+S) increases .

I've searched up on the net and it says that the substrate has now been taken up to form E-S and E-S-I , therefore consuming more substrate than the original inhibitor-free equilibrium .

E + S -> ES (equilibrium position shifts to the right)

I've read up on all these and more doubts form in me .

Why is substrate needed to form ESI ?

I understood what it meant by equilibrium position will shift to the right . It is harder to form E + P as more substrate will form ESI.

Thanks !

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ u should add the link where u read that the substrate is required for the intermediate complex formation otherwise the question is unclear. $\endgroup$ – user 33690 Aug 14 '17 at 15:49
1
$\begingroup$

An uncom-petitive inhibitor doesn't compete with the natural substrate of the enzyme for active site i.e. it binds at a site distinct from the substrate active site and binds to the $ES$ complex.

enter image description here

$K_I$ is the equilibrium constant for inhibitor binding to $E$ and $K_I^{'}$ is the equilibrium con- stant for inhibitor binding to $ES$. Uncompetetive inhibitor lowers the value of $V_{max}$ and $K_m$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.