2
$\begingroup$

I've seen this circulating on social networks:

enter image description here

I was wondering to what extent is it true. Do skin mites really get on the skin surface to reproduce? Why is it so?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Yes, it is true that these mites exist on healthy human skin, on >98% of people, no matter the country or hygiene.

However, I'm sorry to say that this photograph is not the follicle mite Demodex folliculorum. This image has been widely circulated around the internet as Demodex, but it is actually the head of a silkworm, Bombyx mori. The above version has been modified slightly from the original, but you can see the original here: https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/720736/view/silkworm-head-sem

And here is a zoomed out version of a silkworm: https://macrocritters.wordpress.com/2012/11/26/photographing-down-the-food-web-silkworms-bombyx-mori/

You can find a real close-up of Demodex here: https://www.sciencesource.com/archive/Demodex-folliculorum-(SEM)-SS2367855.html

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is there a reference on the Demodex population spread? Also the last link is behind paywall. $\endgroup$ – Tomáš Zato Jan 30 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't answer the main question about mite reproduction, but it does address the "is it true?" portion of the OP's post. Good on you for catching it. +1 $\endgroup$ – theforestecologist Jan 30 at 15:37
-3
$\begingroup$

Do skin mites really get on the skin surface to reproduce? Why is it so?

Yes, it is most definitely possible for skin mites to sexually reproduce on the surface on human skin. Do they specifically congregate on the human face though? Well, I think that varies by case; but yes, I would imagine that it does happen.

When skin mites are present, they cause a condition called Scabies. The skin mites will dig burrows within a person's skin, and the females will lay eggs. When this occurs, the skin becomes quite agitated, which will result in redness and excessive itchiness. That being said though, I believe you would be aware if a skin mite infestation were to occur. And why do they do this? Well, it's just how they've evolved to survive!

See here for further information regarding this.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So there are no mites on healthy skin? $\endgroup$ – Tomáš Zato Aug 28 '17 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @TomášZato I think it would be more accurate to say: if you don't show any symptoms of Scabies, then you don't have a skin mite infestation. $\endgroup$ – DavidAimesJr Aug 28 '17 at 18:00
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ This answer is wrong because it only refers to Sarcoptic mites. The image in the question is of a Demodectic mite, which are constantly and nearly universally present in humans and do not cause classical scabies. $\endgroup$ – iayork Sep 27 '17 at 14:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @DavidAimesJr Scabies is due to sarcoptic mites, not demodectic mites. Demodex are almost always harmless natural inhabitants, e.g. of human faces. Very rarely, dogs (usually with a immune defect) can get a disease that looks a little like scabies, but isn't scabies. This is all in the links I included. Your answer is basically completely misleading because you're talking about the wrong species of mite. $\endgroup$ – iayork Oct 13 '17 at 22:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As a physician, I second @iayork's assessment. This answer is completely mistaken. $\endgroup$ – anongoodnurse Oct 27 '17 at 14:55
-3
$\begingroup$

Not only do skin mites have sex on your face, but my suspicion is that -- quite often -- they're having INCEST on your face. (I.e., brothers inseminate their own sisters.) Admittedly, I'm not sure about the Demodex species that live on humans, but I know that among mites as a general group, there are various species that have evolved genetic mechanisms to make brother/sister mating less harmful than it would otherwise be.

And if you're a tiny, slow-moving creature that is unlikely to travel more than a few centimeters from the spot where you and your siblings hatched out, the odds of meeting an "unrelated" mite -- say, third cousin or farther -- are not very great. Most of your potential mates are likely to be genetically close kin; and sometimes, a sibling may be the only option. Beggars can't be choosers, any port in a storm, etc.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please add references to your answer. $\endgroup$ – another 'Homo sapien' Aug 19 '18 at 5:42
  • $\begingroup$ This doesn't try to answer the question. $\endgroup$ – theforestecologist Dec 20 '18 at 14:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.