Why is GTP used for nuclear transport and not ATP, given that ATP hydrolysis is used to drive most cellular energonic reactions?

  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Biology SE! This appears to be a homework question. Homework questions are off-topic on our site unless you have shown your attempt at an answer. For more information see our homework policy. $\endgroup$
    – vkehayas
    Commented Oct 22, 2017 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ Would be very interesting to know, if there was some systems-biology reason (that would extend beyond a superficial answer such as the most prominent nuclear transport proteins using using GTP). (note: ATP can be required for some aspects of nuclear transport, in particular for RNA) $\endgroup$
    – tsttst
    Commented Oct 22, 2017 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ @vkehayas I think this is an open question in biochemistry, and as such not likely homework (or else a very tricky assignment :) To my knowledge at least, it is not understood why different nucleotides are preferred as energy source by different systems -- if indeed there is any advantage to this scheme at all. Protein synthesis and gluconeogenesis (PEPCK) also uses GTP, btw. $\endgroup$
    – Roland
    Commented Oct 23, 2017 at 6:34
  • $\begingroup$ @Roland I am aware that this is not a resolved issue. I was attempting to nudge the OP to give us some background on why this question is interesting to them and what research they have done already. $\endgroup$
    – vkehayas
    Commented Oct 23, 2017 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited the question slightly and removed the homework tag as I don't think it relevant. (I have gone on to provide an answer of sorts.) $\endgroup$
    – David
    Commented Oct 26, 2017 at 7:52

1 Answer 1



Although this question appears to be either unclear or unanswerable (or both), and shows no evidence of research on the poster’s part, I have chosen to address one aspect of it to emphasize a general concept. This, despite the fact that my knowledge of nuclear transport processes is minimal.

Brief Answer

GTP, rather than ATP, is used for nuclear–cytoplasmic transport via importins and exportins, because this process involves one of a large family of ‘G proteins’ that — as their name implies — operate through the use of GTP. Whereas ATP is generally used to drive endergonic molecular reactions, the hydrolysis of GTP in G-protein cycles can be thought as a device to terminate a molecular process. Whether G proteins adopted GTP rather than ATP merely by chance or for a biological reason is a matter of speculation.

NTP hydrolysis — for fun or profit?

It would appear that the question relates to protein-transporting ‘importins and exportins’, which I learn from the Wikipedia article on nuclear transport are regulated by the small G protein, Ran. When complexed to GTP, Ran facilitates the export of proteins by exportins, a process that is terminated by hydrolysis of GTP to GDP. The GDP-bound form facilitates the import of proteins by importins, a process that is terminated by GTP displacing the GDP.

So if we consider the role of the hydrolysis of the nucleotide triphosphate — here GTP — it is clearly not to supply thermodynamic energy for an endergonic process such as muscle contraction, light generation or a chemical reaction with a +ve ΔG: Use of ATP to drive endergonic processes

Rather, it is to produce a conformational change in a protein which allows the termination of a process. This termination is generally through the GDP-bound form of the G protein (grey) interacting with some other protein (black): GTP hydrolysis and G proteins

This diagram is deliberately simplistic so that the general features of G-protein action can be seen. However, I think it illustrates the same point made in Berg et al. Section 15.6. Other examples are signal transduction of hormone action via cyclic AMP and binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome.

Why do G proteins use GTP?

This ‘choice’ of GTP in the original ancestral G protein could have been mere chance, that was subsequently reflected in other G proteins that arose through gene duplication and divergence. That would imply that, at least, it was not disadvantageous. Or as the oldest G proteins are perhaps those involved in protein biosynthesis — a process still catalysed by a ribozyme — the choice of GTP might have reflected an RNA base-pairing interaction in the ‘RNA world’.

Alternatively one might suggest a biological rationale for separating two types of energy-requiring processes — perhaps by regulation of the enzyme that catalyses the conversion of ATP to GTP, dinucleoside-phosphate kinase. However I am not aware of any evidence to support this idea.

Hydrolysis of GTP in other contexts

As mentioned in a comment by @Roland, there are instances where GTP is used to drive endergonic reactions (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase) in a manner analogous to the use of ATP, but this is quite different from hydrolysis of GTP in G proteins. I do not believe that any convincing rationale for this has been propounded, nor for the similar exceptional use of UTP in glycogen synthesis and CTP in phospholipid synthesis. This question has been discussed in another post.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .