0
$\begingroup$

I am working on optimizing growth rates for a culture, and one thing I'm trying to monitor is nutrient consumption rates to pinpoint any bottlenecks, i.e. the culture goes through all the calcium in a few hours and then stops growing.

Short of manually taking samples every few minutes and running individual tests for wide arrays of nutrients (minerals, amino acids, nitrogen compounds, etc.), is there a standard way of monitoring nutrient levels automatically in real-time? This is a personal research project, so unfortunately I don't have access to industrial bioreactors and the like.

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I assume LCMS is out of the picture? $\endgroup$ – canadianer Feb 27 '18 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ @canadianer Unless it can be conducted by a self-contained sensor that doesn't require my intervention for measurements, obviously a bit of a stretch $\endgroup$ – TheEnvironmentalist Feb 27 '18 at 17:38
1
$\begingroup$

Enzyme-based sensors for taking real-time measurements of growth substrates do exist. In brief: an enzyme degrades the substrate and thus changes the local redox state which is detected electronically (example glucose sensor). There's no guarantee that the substrates that you want to measure can be measured using such sensors. Also I think those sensors are fairly expensive and are tailored to specific conditions (ie it's not as simple as dipping the sensor into your culture medium). Practically speaking I think systems using these sensors are limited to monitoring just a small number of substrates.

LCMS or GCMS is the standard method for measuring concentrations of substrates. LC or GC (without the MS) may be possible, but probably not since there are are many components to culture media and so lots of overlapping peaks. Using this method is labor intensive (lots of samples), likely to be low resolution (temporally), and the equipment is pretty pricey, but if you have access to an LCMS and are willing to put the time in to become an LCMS expert then this is a good option.

Culture based methods using minimal media supplemented with substrates is an option, these experiments may achieve the same thing as real-time monitoring of substrate concentrations. If you have access to a plate reader this will be so much easier. The speed at which different substrates are consumed, and the order in which they are consumed can be inferred by measuring the growth rate of the bacteria and the final population size/dry weight of the culture.

I mention this culture-based method because, although it's not exactly what your question was about, it's much cheaper than the other options and much more established (and in my opinion more fun: you get a great feel for how the bacteria grow and what media they like, and the graphs look great).

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The whole purpose of this is to identify bottlenecks in growth and factors which increase growth rates. If I only measured the bacteria themselves, I'd know the effects but not the causes. How is there not a real-time way of measuring this stuff considering the same factors can be used to optimize plant growth in the industry that feeds the world? Do realtime nutrient sensors not exist? $\endgroup$ – TheEnvironmentalist Mar 3 '18 at 14:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TheEnvironmentalist As I said, they do exist, but they are expensive and not as convenient as say a temperature sensor. And about the culture based method: you can match effects to causes if you are causing the causes. So if you compare [M9 (minimal media) + glucose] to [M9 + glucose + acetate], any difference in growth will be due to the acetate. $\endgroup$ – Timothy Rozday Mar 4 '18 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.