"Males do not show meiotic recombination, facilitating genetic studies."

For a while I have known that this phenomenon occurs, this quote comes from the Wikipedia page on Drosophila melanogaster, and I frequently use this feature of Drosophila in constructing hemiclones for my own research in quantitative genetics.

But, until now, I have never asked why doesn't recombination happen? Why would this feature evolve?

Further, why is the absence of recombination sex-limited to males, why do females have recombination?


3 Answers 3


This is a venerable fact. Exceptions in D. melanogaster strain Y-007 have been observed and D. ananassae has consistent male cross-overs, but this work dates back to the 1970s.

This Current Biology 2002 paper is not exactly new, but sheds some light on the issue in question.

In male Drosophila melanogaster, meiosis occurs in the absence of recombination or a recognizable synaptonemal complex (SC).

The authors used a GFP-lac fusion to observe a series of sections of the male fly in meiosis with integrated lac - specific binding regions. They see for the most part that the GFP bound segments of the DNA are not associated in cell division. That is, homologous chromosomes physically associate during meiosis (via the SC) and in male drosophila, they do not.

It seems from more recent work, that the details of how this work is still being worked out but several gene regions and factors have been identified. Suspected factors that help conspire to align the various homologous chromosomes are being looked into. Take a look at the P.I.s biblio for more.

This isn't my main field, but as I understand it, many aspects of meiosis are still being mapped out.

As to the question of how this evolved and why; its definitely strange. It looks like there is a gender selected trait where the SC doesn't form in males. Its easy to imagine a mutation that caused males only to lose recombination - the process is so complex its hard to imagine such a trait not showing up.

Still it's surprising to think that the trait has not only survived but become dominant in Drosophila all over the world. To be a common traits to so many Drosophila species, it must have happened more than 10 million years ago. Explanations of the advantages of sexual reproduction often include recombination. Even the human Y chromosome has a self-recombination mechanism that reduces error in the coding regions. As such, its hard to believe that this is not a huge disadvantage for the flies. Still, if if it were such a big deal, you'd imagine Y-007 would have dominated and re-introduced the trait.

The only theory I can think of might be called 'lazy males'; that the males got the females to do one more thing for the offspring and it somehow outcompetes the sperm of the recombining males. Lots of sperm are non-motile; that's a fact for humans, I have no idea what its like for flies that recombine. Take a look at the variance in morphology as well - sperm are really crazy ugly sometimes and a good deal of the mating process is to help weed out the defective ones. Without recombination, might it be that males produce viable sperm at a greater rate, helping them in sperm competition, which I'm sure is the case for fly mating - Drosophila are not monogamous too I'd guess? Anyway that's not a researched idea, just a guess on my part.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ thanks, this is a good answer so far, could you shed any light as to why that might evolve? $\endgroup$
    – rg255
    Feb 20, 2013 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for asking this question! the answer is I don't know and it seems like a lot of the speculation behind this would be buried into the fly literature pretty deeply. I put a guess into the entry. I'm actually going to write one of the authors and ask them what they think though. It's the sort of question some of us scratch our heads about while a dozen or so talk about the fine points over coffee every day. $\endgroup$
    – shigeta
    Feb 20, 2013 at 14:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @shigeta The link to the "Current Biology 2002 paper" is broken. Do you remember the reference? Thanks $\endgroup$
    – Remi.b
    Jun 26, 2017 at 18:21

To the best of my knowledge there is no strong evidence as to the reason why. The most reasonable explanation seems to be that it evolved as a crude mechanism for preventing recombination of the male sex-chromosome.

You might then ask why a mechanism targeted to the sex-chromosome specifically (as in humans) did not evolve to which I'd suggest that evolution frequently continues with "good enough" solutions where the benefits of apparently better solutions are small or don't involve incremental benefits and note that there is some evidence that lower rates of recombination are beneficial in Drosophila (ref]).


This phenomena is known as achiasmy, where recombination is absent in one sex in a species. The Haldane Huxley rule states that in achiasmic species, the sex without recombination will always be the heterogametic sex (XY or ZW). This is basically the only consistent rule relating to recombination. There seem to be exceptions to every other theory and pattern observed. The Haldane Huxley rule supports the theory that achiasmy evolved to prevent non-homologous recombination between X and Y. However there are species (most mammals) where the X and Y do experience recombination, but recombination is limited to a small part of the chromosomes called the psudo-autosomal region.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .