I don't understand why you would call them that. How did these names originate/where did these names come from?

  • $\begingroup$ Was able to add some more information on the "TE" terminology after you accepted the answer, just a FYI if you are interested. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    May 1 '18 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks I see now, it's a lot clearer now that I know it has no meaning. $\endgroup$
    – liyuan
    May 3 '18 at 12:14

These are very old names for primate cortical areas, originally from the anatomist Constantin von Economo and also used by von Bonin and Bailey (1947) (where the TEO region name seems to originate).

Like Brodmann areas these regions were defined by cytoarchitecture well before most functions were determined.

I discovered another work that I can access from 1935, Rose (1935) that is quite helpful for the TE terminology. From Rose it is clear that von Economo labeled areas in the temporal lobe TA, TB, TC, etc. up to TH. So they seem to be simply "temporal"+letters of the alphabet. Rose refers to "Area temporalis propria" as area TE, comprised of Brodmann areas 21 and 20; Rose calls Brodmann 21 "TE1" and Brodmann 20 "TE2" which are separated based on the size of layer 3 pyramidal cells.

As far as the TEO terminology, Boussaoud et al (1991) write:

In their study of the cytoarchitecture of macaque cortex, von Bonin and Bailey ('47) labeled this region with a question mark on their section drawings but showed a photomicrograph through the region that they labeled “TEO.”

This is the best evidence I can find that the TEO name a) originated with von Bonin and Bailey, and b) that the further origin or meaning of the name is unclear; it's just a label on a photomicrograph that wasn't even used in the drawings by those authors who instead used a ?. I suspect further authors preferred the TEO terminology rather than confusingly referring to "area ?" and yet they felt like giving credit to von Bonin and Bailey for their work on the macaque cortex.

It's unclear to me whether TEO is meant to be an acronym; "temporal" is part of the name, but whether O stands for a word (perhaps occipital, as it is toward the occipital lobe?) or if it is actually the number 0, or a non-English word (possibly German or Latin?). However, when more modern neuroscientists refer to area TE and area TEO, they are simply intending to refer to "area TE and area TEO in the von Economo/von Bonin & Bailey terminology."

Other terminology, such as referring to posterior or anterior inferior temporal cortex, may seem more descriptive but there isn't anything inherently wrong with referring to the older names as long as people know what area you refer to. TE and TEO are clear, short names that have been used for decades, whereas inventing a new acronym like PIT or AIT would be unfamiliar at this point.


Boussaoud, D., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1991). Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 306(4), 554-575.

Rose, M. (1935). Cytoarchitektonik und Myeloarchitektonik der Großhirnrinde. Handbuch der Neurologie, 1, 588-778.

von Bonin, G., & Bailey, P. (1947). The neocortex of Macaca mulatta.(Illinois Monogr. med. Sci., 5, No. 4.).

von Economo, C. F., & Koskinas, G. N. (1925). Die cytoarchitektonik der hirnrinde des erwachsenen menschen. J. Springer.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.