I am trying to make a point to someone that just because two plants share a family and one plant is safe for human consumption, it does not follow that the other plant also is safe for human consumption. Can anyone provide an example I can use as proof?

  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Well, given that often enough a plant is considered "edible", while parts of THE SAME PLANT are already poisonous (see the potato), it stands to reason that the definition of "safe for human consumption" is far too lax of a term to even allow for a clear "no there aren't any". [Also there's a ton of counterexamples, like Byans below] $\endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Sep 25 '18 at 10:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "family" in itself is such a borad term, that even a pure explanation to what a plant family is accidentallly provided an answer to your question: maximumyield.com/definition/785/plant-family [it's the nightshades again though, but this shows how valid your point is] $\endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Sep 25 '18 at 10:32

The most classic example if you want to win this argument would be the family Solanaceae.

Also referred to as the Nightshade family, it includes the deadly nightshade or Atropa belladonna and many other plants not safe to eat.

Other members of the family are tomatoes, peppers, potatoes, and more.

Plant families can be massively diverse, and toxicity doesn't really have much relationship to family. Most of the compounds that are found in plants that are toxic are found in other non-toxic plants as well: dose is crucial.

  • 22
    $\begingroup$ Potato is also an example of a plant that is considered non-toxic, but parts of the plant are toxic and - even worse - the tubers can become toxic. The green parts (leaves, stems, etc) contain a poisonous alkaloid. If a potato in storage starts to sprout, the sprouts and eyes are often toxic. If the potato itself enlarges while sprouting, it will also typically have elevated toxicity. $\endgroup$
    – Peter
    Sep 23 '18 at 11:14
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @Peter: Another common example is rhubarb. The stems are edible (at least when cooked), but the leaves are toxic due to concentrations of oxalic acid. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Sep 23 '18 at 18:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe that if the potato tuber is exposed to sunlight as the plant grows, it will also become green and poisonous, like the leaves. $\endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Sep 24 '18 at 14:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Indeed, not just potatoes - tomatoes are toxic as well (leaves, unripe fruit...), and arguably, so are peppers (not "deadly" toxic, but the capsaicin is definitely another thing "designed" to make mammals avoid eating the fruit; it's not spicy to birds, who are the primary dispersers of pepper seeds) and eggplant (though that one has been pretty effectively domesticated to be safe as long as it's not raw). But it still definitely counts as "safe for human consumption" as long as you avoid the poisonous parts. $\endgroup$
    – Luaan
    Sep 25 '18 at 7:55
  • $\begingroup$ Mmmmm...fried green tomatoes! So cooking eliminates the toxicity of unripe tomato fruits, @Luaan? $\endgroup$ Sep 25 '18 at 19:43

The Apiaceae family has many edible plants including carrot, parsley, fennel, celery, and parsnip, and has toxic plants such as poison hemlock, fool's parsley, and giant hogweed.


Both the cashew and poison ivy are members of the Anacardiaceae family.

  • 15
    $\begingroup$ For what it's worth, part of the cashew plant is actually lethally toxic as well. $\endgroup$ Sep 23 '18 at 2:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AustinHemmelgarn which parts are toxic? Any sources? $\endgroup$
    – Mahesh
    Sep 23 '18 at 11:33
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ The shell of the nut itself,, which is why they're almost always sold with the shells already removed.. Just like poison ivy, it has oils that cause contact dermatitis, and if ingested can cause potentially lethal internal reactions in the digestive tract. Also like poison ivy,, the smoke from burning the shells is really dangerous because the oils don't completely combust. $\endgroup$ Sep 23 '18 at 12:03
  • $\begingroup$ The poison ivy, oak, and sumac all used to be in the genus Rhus alon gwith edible sumac used as a spice. $\endgroup$
    – kingledion
    Sep 25 '18 at 16:14

Fungi are not plants and you've tagged this as botany, so this is perhaps off-topic, but I feel like it might help you make your point: the genus Amanita contains extremely toxic species (A. phalloides), highly regarded edible ones (A. caesarea) as well as psychoactive ones (A. muscaria).


While all the other answers have described one plant family having both edible species as well as poisonous species, I am compiling all the families in one answer.

  1. Anacardiaceae

Mangos (Mangifera indica) and Cashews (Anacardium occidentale) belong to Anacardiaceae, and also the poisonous Sumacs (Rhus spp.).

  1. Apiaceae

Carrots (Daucus carrota), Parsnips (Pastinica sativa), Dill (Anethum graveolens) and the poisonous Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum), and Water Hemlock (Cicuta spp.)

  1. Apocynaceae

Milkweed (Asclepias spp.) and the poisonous Dogbane (Apocynum spp.) is commonly known as the poisonous relative of Milkweed.

  1. Ranunculaceae

Marsh Marigold (Caltha palustrus) and the poisonous Buttercups (Ranunculus spp.)

  1. Solanaceae

Food crops like Potatoes and Tomatoes and deadly poisons like Deadly Nightshade (Atropa belladonna), Jimson Weed (Datura spp.) etc.


  1. https://survivalcache.com/5-poisonous-plant-families-the-survivalist-should-know/
  2. http://www.botanyeveryday.com/online-classes/2013-plant-talk-8-poisonous-plant-families
  3. http://mentalfloss.com/article/69254/8-edible-plants-potentially-deadly-doppelgangers
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ This would be better as a community answer. $\endgroup$
    – CJ Dennis
    Sep 24 '18 at 5:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See Prunus Dulcis: bitter almond vs. sweet almond – contains enough cyanide that "approximately 50 bitter almonds" will kill an adult and "5–10 bitter almonds may be fatal" for children. $\endgroup$ Sep 25 '18 at 16:51
  • $\begingroup$ Many common names are reused for different plants. This is true for "buttercup" which is also used for daffodils and pink evening primrose. Thanks for including the binomial. $\endgroup$ Sep 25 '18 at 19:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.