This question already has an answer here:

Taking a look in internet you can find photos of mutated mammals with 6 legs. Some cows with legs in unnatural positions were shown in website versions of widely known newspapers (you can easily guess here that if the animal gets his additional legs in the back or another unuseful position why a mutation like that wont spread, but the point here it's 2 additional legs in mammals do appear occasionally) . Also there are some dubious photos of sheeps with appparently functional 6 legs, these ones are dubious and hard to confirm if real, some clearly fake but the dubious ones are there and make you wonder. Insects have 6 legs, there are confirmed mutations of mammals with 6 legs, then why did it never appear a mammal species with 6 legs. Is there any known reason why 6 leg mammals are only found in mutations? (how about size and enviroment, is there any reason in those for them not to get 6 legs?)

marked as duplicate by Remi.b evolution Nov 9 at 1:18

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • What make you thing that those cases are caused by mutations (in other words than leg number has a non-zero heritability) rather than some other developmental defect? – Remi.b Nov 9 at 1:18
up vote 1 down vote accepted

If stability is the goal, more legs tend to be better. However, having lots of legs also comes with a cost: they take energy to build and use, have extra weight, etc, and they don't really add any speed.

Insects are incredibly successful and likely evolved from many-legged ancestors, losing legs for efficiency but stopping at six. For small creatures with exoskeletons like insects, having fewer than 6 legs means too much loss of stability, because they rely on a tripod of 3 legs while moving the other three.

However, mammals and the vertebrates in general are larger and don't have exoskeletons and can use balancing and moving strategies that insects cannot. Further, they have evolved with four appendages since before they walked on land.

For a 6-legged vertebrate to evolve, there would need to be a selective advantage for having 6 legs versus 4; since vertebrates get along just fine with 4 legs, adding two more isn't likely.

I would also add that just because you can observe mammals with more than 4 legs does not necessarily mean that is a heritable trait. It could instead be caused by environmentally-induced errors in development. I think for the cases you mention this is probably most likely.


Lanham, U. N. (1951). Why do insects have six legs?. Science, 113(2945), 663-663.

  • 2
    Also worth pointing out that many insects have adhesive feet, and more feet allows for more adhesion. An ant with 6 legs sticks to a wall 50% better than an ant with 4 legs. Water skimming insects, too, spread the hydrophobic force over all their legs, and might fall through the surface of the water with fewer legs. – Nuclear Wang Nov 8 at 18:37
  • @NuclearWang Good point. Although larger mammals like OP is thinking of are certainly too large to achieve some of those feats that could benefit from extra limbs, other vertebrates have done so by having longer toes rather than extra appendages (like the Jesus lizard). – Bryan Krause Nov 8 at 18:39

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.