3
$\begingroup$

I've been quite confused by the source of the additional 1H+ cost right now. I know it costs the F1Fo-ATP synthase 3H+ to produce an ATP, and it is also stated that:

ADP3−cytoplasm + ATP4−matrix → ADP3−matrix + ATP4−cytoplasm // ADP/ATP exchange is energetically expensive: about 25% of the energy yielded from electron transfer by aerobic respiration, or one hydrogen ion, is consumed to regenerate the membrane potential that is tapped by ADP/ATP translocase.(Wikipedia/ADP/ATP Translocase)

So in some books I find out that they regard the net cost of producing an ATP as 4H+. Here is another statement:

The phosphate carrier, which works in concert with ATP-ADP translocase, mediates the electroneutral exchange of H2PO4-for OH- (or, indistinguishably, the electroneutral symport of H2PO4- and H+). The combined action of these two transporters leads to the exchange of cytosolic ADP and Pi for matrix ATP at the cost of an influx of one H+. (Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. Biochemistry. 5th edition. New York: W H Freeman; 2002. Section 18.5, Many Shuttles Allow Movement Across the Mitochondrial Membranes.)

And my question comes here. Why do we not consider the effect of the process of ADP + Pi → ATP on the membrane potential? It also produces a net cost of 2e-. Putting these together, this will lead to 0, i.e. no additional net cost. Or should I only consider H+ but not e-? (This might lead to another problem about H2PO4-'s breakup.)

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The energy required for the ATP production by ATP synthase is obtained from movement of ions (H+ or in some cases Na+) downstream of their potential (proton motive force). I guess, there is no exact stoichiometric exchange as in case of ion pumps. The rotation of the motor is generated by the movement of protons through a channel. The H+/ATP ratio is estimated using biophysical/biochemical techniques.

Brand and Lehninger (1977) estimated this ratio to be greater than 3.

Turina et al. (2003) recalculated this ratio using constituted liposomes and their estimate is 3.9 ± 0.2.

This is an excerpt from a more recent study on chloroplast ATP synthase by Hahn et al (2018).

The symmetry mismatch between the 14-fold Fo rotor and the near-threefold F1 head means that the number of c subunits rotating past subunit a to generate one ATP is not an integer. cF1Fo requires, on average, 4.67 c subunits, or protons, to produce one ATP. The nearest integral numbers of c subunits per step would be 4, 5, and 5, equivalent to rotation angles of 103°, 129°, and 129°. Surprisingly however, the three conformations are separated by rotations of 103°, 112°, and 145°, or 4, 4.4, and 5.6 c subunits (fig. S5C). This means that the position of the c subunits relative to subunit a in the three conformations differs.

The structure and efficiency of chloroplast ATP synthase may be a little different but what I want to emphasize is that there is no exact exchange of protons and ATP.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Yes, that the calculations are just estimated from experiments is a fair point. But actually it was some statements from pratice problems when I studied biochemistry that cause some ambiguity, for example the contradictory statements 'ATP/ADP tanslocase adds 1 net cost to ATP production' and 'Pi/H+ transfer adds one'. But I will bear in mind that they're all rough calculations. I really thought the F1Fo-ATP synthase was symmetric (regardless of the change in conformation) just like the honeycomb before I read your answer. $\endgroup$ – user48867 Jan 12 at 5:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.