I have a few questions I can't seem to get a straight answer to, regarding the .gen
file format and also biology in general.
The .gen
file format specifies SNPs for individuals.
Since each SNP has associated allele A and allele B, I assume that the file only contains Causative SNPs, and not Linked SNPs, since the former reside in the gene, and the later don't. Since each SNP in the file has an associated gene (actually genotype, some combination of allele A and B). Correct?
SNP indicate a single position in genome, so why can allele be identified with a sequence larger then one? Or does it indicate just a starting point, where each allele can be of different length, which can be greater than 1?
Allele should be a particular variant of a specific gene, but in other places I saw the definition "Alleles are alternative forms of a particular sequence.". The later seems more logical, if looking at the .gen
file, but it's contradictory to the first statement. So, what's the correct definition?
EDIT:
After further research I came up with findings, demonstrated in an example row for .gen
file:
--- rs200405949 10023 CCAA C 0.249 0.745 0.007 0.005 0.84 0.155 ...
---
- chromosome number, which is missing because it can be inferred from the filename, belonging to each chromosome
rs200405949
- ID of the SNP - a single nucleotide which can vary between samples/people; there are usually only two possible variations, but in rare cases there is a third or even fourth - which are ignored in .gen
?
10023
- allele pair (base pair) coordinate/position inside the said chromosome. Either both major and minor allele are made of a single nucleotide (in which case the SNP coordinate/position inside the said chromosome might coincide with this position), or one of the alleles will have more than one nucleotide and the other allele will be the same as the first nucleotide of the former allele - because we need only one distinct sequence, and all other combinations of same nucleotide length are automatically the other allele?
CCAA
- (usually?) major allele - the most common allele (specifically in this context, a single nucleotide or a sequence of nucleotides) for a given SNP (or near it, i.e. somehow connected to it) IN the cohort in question, i.e. the cohort being all the samples/people in the experiment/.gen
file (hence, the number of samples equals the number of triplet columns after the 5-th column onwards). It occurs in more than 50% of the times COMPARED to minor allele. Compared to minor allele, they both start with C - shouldn't they differ at this SNP position by definition? Also, more than one nucleotide is specified here - why? SNP always has one nucleotide...
C
- (usually?) minor allele - the second most frequent allele (specifically in this context, a single nucleotide). The SNP site can be bi-allelic (mostly picked/studied), in which case the major and minor alleles are the only possible alleles, but some sites are tri- or quad-allelic - in which case we don't have the info for the third (and fourth) allele variants, but we know they are even less common then the major and minor alleles?
0.249 0.745 0.007
0.005 0.84 0.155
...
- each subsequent triplet of values then indicate likelihoods of homozygote CCAA/CCAA, heterozygote CCAA/C, and homozygote C/C genotypes (allele pairs) at this SNP, respectively, for one sample/person (each allele is present on one of the two copies of the said chromosome, either maternal or paternal). If one of the three values has a value 1 and the other two have 0, I guess this actual SNP was (somehow) tested for, hence we can be 100% sure which allele pair it is, and if not, then the probabilities were somehow deduced (e.g. from other, somehow related SNPs perhaps). What if they add up to less than one? Or even what if all of the three values are 0?
Are my conclusions correct? And what about the open question?